Fashion has become more and more important when people choose clothes. Why? Do you think it is a positive or negative development?
Fashionable garments have risen to prominence in recent decades due to the globalization, changing the way people choose clothes. Given that this pattern could be attributed to many reasons, it could be fraught with many pitfalls.
It is true that there are many reasons behind this situation. First, fashionable clothes express wearers’ personal identity and taste in fashion style, thereby gaining more respect and admiration from other people. Subsequently, If individuals select clothes incompatible with the current fashion trend, they would be deemed low-society and old-fashioned. Second, fashionable garments suggest the correlation with exorbitant prices. It is implied that the affordability of these expensive items of clothing is the sign of prosperity, directly pushing people to purchase them in order to show off their socio-economic status.
However, it should be acknowledged that this trend could lead to several repercussions.First, Fashion could be prioritised over other criteria such as materials and functionality when it comes to the selection of clothes. In fact, many women purchase dresses designed elegant and artistic without knowing that they are irrelevant and incongruous in real-life situations. In addition, women wearing high-fashion garment especially those are short and tight to the body could enhance their sexual allure, thereby making them more vulnerable to sexual harassment and even abuse by male counterparts.
In conclusion, This pattern could stem from personal reasons. However, it could culminate in detrimental impacts such as the indifference to other criteria when choosing clothes or even the increase in cases of sexual abuse in women.
- Some people believe that robots will play an important role in future societies while others argue that robots might have negative effects on society Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Some people think that international travel makes them prejudiced rather than broad-minded.Give reasons why people fail to benefit from travel and how to improve the understanding ofcountries you visit. 73
- The price of a cup of coffee in six cities from 2010 to 2014 in Australia 57
- Discuss the advantage and disadvantage of giving international aids to poor countries. 89
- Developing countries need financial help from international organizations > 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 88, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: First
...end could lead to several repercussions.First, Fashion could be prioritised over othe...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...and even abuse by male counterparts. In conclusion, This pattern could stem fro...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1455.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 251.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.796812749 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15355192817 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.605577689243 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.7722557505 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.25 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9166666667 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135460744117 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0475111377584 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0464974912423 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0819890663234 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0206422823059 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.36 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.29 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.