The food travels thousands of miles from farm to consumer. Some people think it would be better to our environment and economy if people only ate local produced food. What extent do the advantages outweigh disadvantages?
A topic that has recently become a long-running dispute, is locally produced food, which leads to a moot question “does it bring more advantages?”. Although it is highly argued that local produced foods provide people with more benefits, I am inclined to believe that they bring several negatives.
In economic terms, it is crystal clear that regional farming is indeed bound to increasing agricultural products, which means that it would lead to both being more affordable and importing less goods. For example, a group of reputable scientists, working at a prestigious university, conducted a longitudinal study to understand the relationship between variety of fruits and vegetables, exporting crops, and being a source of revenue. Thus, this evidence presented thus far support the connection that economic success is positively correlated with not only earning more money but also with being more profitable.
From an environmental perspective, there is little room for doubt that producing more waste is attributable to consuming more pesticides, in that it would lead to being more environmentally friendly and creating more job opportunities as well as the lack of labors. A well-known example of such attributions is producing more genetically modified crops, which are cause for concern since they had been mistaken in taking an increasing population for granted. Thus, it is obvious that fertile lands and transporting goods could play a significant role in rising consumption.
Considering all the reasons mentioned above, the advantages of local products are of high importance. However, as every garden may have some weeds, local authorities are recommended to enforce some strict legislation, and individuals are hoped to heighten their intellect.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-05-23 | hang9815 | 72 | view |
| 2019-12-05 | yasamin.gharib62 | 85 | view |
| 2019-08-20 | jjj | 93 | view |
| 2019-08-12 | mojtaba1980 | 77 | view |
| 2019-01-09 | Anjali Gupta | 55 | view |
- Is it usually foolish to get married before completing your studies and getting established in a good job? Do you agree or disagree” 83
- Air travel can only benefit the richest people in the world. Ordinary people can get no advantage with the development of air travel. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 80
- You are given climate as the field of study. Which area will you prefer? Explain why you picked up the particular area of your study? 11
- Do you think the consumer should avoid over packed products or it is the responsibility of the producer to avoid extra packaging of products? Give your views or any relevant example of your own experiences. 61
- Effective learning requires time, comfort and peace, so it is impossible to combine study and employment. Study and employment distract one from another. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 34, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
A topic that has recently become a long-running dispute, is locally produced food, whic...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 190, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun goods is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...oth being more affordable and importing less goods. For example, a group of reputabl...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, thus, well, for example, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.5418719212 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1514.0 1207.87684729 125% => OK
No of words: 270.0 242.827586207 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60740740741 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18948890987 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 139.433497537 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.655555555556 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 379.143842365 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.6613050598 50.4703680194 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.4 104.977214359 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 20.9669160288 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 7.25397266985 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156283326366 0.242375264174 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0593613877515 0.0925447433944 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0452271275032 0.071462118173 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0948295943159 0.151781067708 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0535781248145 0.0609392437508 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 12.6369458128 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 53.1260098522 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 11.5310837438 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.06 8.32886699507 121% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 55.0591133005 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.