I am of the opinion that we should whatever we can to protect the endangered species. This is requried to maintain the food and biological life-cycle.
I believe that the species that are close to extinction will further disturb the food chain once they are completely gone. That is, if we remove one animal from a food chain the count of other animals will increase. For example, let's say if snakes become extinct one day, then the population of rats will rise as snakes eat rats. This outnumbering of rats will lead to increase in contamination of food kept to be consumed by humans.
Additionally, to prevent such contamination the humans will start using very strong pesticides to keep the rats away. Such use of pesticides will risk the lives of humans since they will be consuming pesticide preserved food and grains.
Moreover, for meat eating human population if fish or chicken are close to extinction, then their unavailability will result in dependency on other sources of meat. This will lead to an increase in production of other alternative of meat. In some cases, such food type could only be produced using an unnatural or synthetic way. The synthetic food will not have ingredients that are required for a healthy body and are only present in the natural sources available in the form of fish or chicken.
Lastly, God has created nature in a calculative manner to maintain the balance of life. For every species, be it man or animals it's existence on earth is for a purpose. To maintain the sanctity and equilibrium, we have to preserve and nurture every species on earth, present in any form of life.
- Claim: Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today.Reason: We are not able to make connections between current events and past events until we have some distance from both.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to 50
- Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past. 75
- We can learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take 50
- The best ideas arise from a passionate interest in commonplace things.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting you 50
- True success can be measured primarily in terms of the goals one sets for oneself.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and su 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 48, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'kept being'.
Suggestion: kept being
...ad to increase in contamination of food kept to be consumed by humans. To prevent such con...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 108, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...by humans. To prevent such contamination , the humans will start using strong pest...
^^
Line 9, column 32, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a calculative manner" with adverb for "calculative"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...cken. Lastly, God has created nature in a calculative manner to maintain the balance of life. For ev...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, lastly, moreover, so, then, for example, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1331.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78776978417 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64906803222 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532374100719 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 424.8 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.0894406195 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 88.7333333333 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5333333333 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.86666666667 7.06120827912 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0722294978127 0.244688304435 30% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0282803463155 0.084324248473 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0333626820959 0.0667982634062 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0401864581781 0.151304729494 27% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0327578238114 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.