Some developing countries invite large multinational companies to open offices and
factories in order to help their economy. However, others feel that foreign companies
should be shut out and instead the government should help the local companies to
contribute to the economic growth. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is a highly debatable issue whether multinational companies (MNCs) should be encouraged by the governments of developing countries or whether the local companies should be promoted. I firmly believe that MNCs are good for the economic growth. A number of arguments surround my opinion.
There are many advantages of MNCs. To begin with, they provide employment that usually
pays better than other available opportunities. What is more, they train local labor with more
sophisticated techniques which in the long run bring benefits to the host country. They also
raise the growth rate of host nation by introducing new investment and new technology. To
add to it, they promote efficient production and bring a broader range of products to the
widest possible market.
Furthermore, such MNCs promote improvement or development of various supporting
industries or complementary industries. For example, if an MNC opens in a place, then many
businesses open in the neighborhood, which caters to the workers working in these MNCs.
In this way, they stabilize and stimulate local economies, and raise standards of living.
Another important advantage of MNCs is that they induce their local rivals to become more
innovative and competitive. For instance, it is a well-known fact that Indian company
Videocon has improved its standard to compete with MNCs such as Samsung and Sony.
Finally, these companies promote positive values, such as diversity, and equality for women.
They also create an environment of nonviolence and international cooperation.
To conclude, MNCs may have their negative points, but their pros far outweigh their cons. So,
they should be promoted by the governments of developing countries.
- Online language learning has advantages over classroom instruction. 55
- In some countries, teenagers have jobs while they are still students. Do you think this is a good idea? Support your opinion by using specific reasons and details. 55
- The only thing that interferes with my leaning is my education- Einstein. What does he mean by that? And do you think he is correct? 55
- Experience is a more effective way to teach, compared to books? Agree or disagree. 77
- Large shopping malls are replacing the small shops. What is your opinion? 72
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, furthermore, if, may, so, then, well, for example, for instance, such as, to begin with, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1479.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 267.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5393258427 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01773201337 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625468164794 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 379.143842365 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 4.6157635468 238% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.2945161139 50.4703680194 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.6 104.977214359 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8 20.9669160288 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.06666666667 7.25397266985 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 18.0 4.12807881773 436% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 6.9802955665 186% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159076323582 0.242375264174 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0522949027161 0.0925447433944 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0741510235 0.071462118173 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.043856303141 0.151781067708 29% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0579000142608 0.0609392437508 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 12.6369458128 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 53.1260098522 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 11.5310837438 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.32886699507 116% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 55.0591133005 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.