The supplied chart compares total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone call in the United Kingdom distributed between local calls from the fixed lines, national and international calls from the fixed lines and all calls from cell phones in period of 7 years (1995-2002).In general, the minutes called from the all sources had an increasing trend, however, local calls from the land lines showed descending trend after middle of the period as cell phones doubled minutes which people talked from this devices.
As can be seen from the chart, minutes called from the fixed phones slowly climbed over the period from 1995 to 1999, when in 1995, number of minutes called from land lines slightly exceeded seventy per cent and peaking in 1999 with 90 per cent respectively. Lately with increasing of minutes called from mobile phones, calls from the land lines kept dropping to same amount as it is beginning in 1995.
Getting back to the details, national and international minutes called from the land line steadily rose over the period from about 40 per cent in 1995 to about sixty-one per cent in 2002.
It could be noticed that minutes called from the mobil phones had a significant rise over seven years. In 1995 people talked only 3 millions minutes from cell phones, but in 2002 more than 40 millions minutes have been called from mobile devices (local, national and international). The period between 2000 and 2002 had a dramatic growth of minutes called from portable devices, with about 25 per cent in 2000 and forty-five per cent in 2002.
- The Level of Air Pollution in Five Countries 73
- In recent years children have been given more freedom than in the past Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 75
- The graph and table below show the average monthly temperatures and the average number of hours of sunshine per year in three major cities. 67
- The 11
- These days, too many people maintain their health by relying on doctors and medicine, rather than following a healthy lifestyle.To what extent do you agree with this statement?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own kn 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 226, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...oubled minutes which people talked from this devices. As can be seen from the ch...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 33.7804878049 160% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1298.0 965.302439024 134% => OK
No of words: 264.0 196.424390244 134% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91666666667 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32128678968 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.469696969697 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 372.6 283.868780488 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.9413755641 43.030603864 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 162.25 112.824112599 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.0 22.9334400587 144% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253197864959 0.215688989381 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146298599714 0.103423049105 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0540382967045 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176774066599 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0540609153582 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 13.2329268293 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.9 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.85 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.4329268293 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.