The given pie chart outlines percentage of water use worldwide in three different ways in 2000 while bar chart compares water use in China, India, New Zealand and Canada in the same ways of use in 2000. It is clear from the data that agriculture globally consumed the most water, however domestic use shown opposite results. It is noticeable in compare countries the way of use.
Firstly, seventy per cent off water have been used in 2000 for farm's purposes, while only small portion of water used across the world was used for domestic (8 per cent) and industry (22 per cent) reasons.
According to the data, water used in agriculture had majority in India with ninety-two per cent, followed by China with 69 per cent however in Canada water used in farms had only eight per cent of total water use. It is apparently seen that domestic use represent minimal percentage in three of four compared countries, when similar numbers are represented in China (nine per cent), India (five per cent), Canada (twelve per cent), but in New Zealand water use in homes had significant usage with 40 per cent. As is presented in the graph, Canada had the highest usage of water in industry with eighty per cent, when water used in factories in India showed only three per cent.
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 61
- The use of mobile phone is as antisocial as smoking. Smoking is banned in certain places so mobile phone should be banned like smoking. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 66
- Some people prefer shopping in shopping centers, while others prefer local markets. What are the advantages of each? 56
- The Level of Air Pollution in Five Countries 73
- The table below shows the average band scores for students from different language groups taking the IELTS General Test in 2010. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 367, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t is noticeable in compare countries the way of use. Firstly, seventy per cent...
^^
Line 3, column 181, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sed for domestic 8 per cent and industry 22 per cent reasons. According to th...
^^
Line 5, column 366, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...similar numbers are represented in China nine per cent , India five per cent , ...
^^
Line 5, column 381, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... are represented in China nine per cent , India five per cent , Canada twelve ...
^^
Line 5, column 382, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...are represented in China nine per cent , India five per cent , Canada twelve p...
^^
Line 5, column 390, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...esented in China nine per cent , India five per cent , Canada twelve per cent,...
^^
Line 5, column 405, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...a nine per cent , India five per cent , Canada twelve per cent, but in New Zea...
^^
Line 5, column 414, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er cent , India five per cent , Canada twelve per cent, but in New Zealand wate...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, first, firstly, however, if, so, while, in fact, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1039.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68018018018 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31612976989 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504504504505 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 333.9 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.5112525395 43.030603864 164% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.428571429 112.824112599 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.7142857143 22.9334400587 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5714285714 5.23603664747 221% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232982007207 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15729496735 0.103423049105 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100567580574 0.0843802449381 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207439962759 0.15604864568 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114711727504 0.0819641961636 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.46 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.