More and more qualified people are moving from poor to rich countries to fill vacancies in specialist areas like engineering, computing and medicine. Some people believe that by encouraging the movement of such people, rich countries are stealing from poor countries. Others feel that this is only part of the natural movement of workers around the world.
Do you agree or disagree?
Changing terms of living
Since ages, it is being a tendency to wander from one place to another. Let's understand why people migrate? Every human being dreams of a superior standard of living and to improve future of their next generations. Sometimes earnings are substantially decent in big cities. Over the years rich countries have grabbed fair attention by the immigrants.
Rise for migration to such countries has been a fantasy. This need has arisen significantly due to the budding IT industry. More and more skilled workers are willing to relocate to foreign countries for better opportunities with the ever growing technological changes the demand for plenty of expert people has opened up. Some feel these doors to be the path to progress.
Although like every aspect has its own pros and cons, this movement also has positives and negatives. To highlight some of the points such as good career exposure, escalation in tax-free income leading to improved lifestyle, free education for children, advance medical facilities, adventurous social life, etc. The undesirable points are the loss of touch from culture, longing for family gatherings, economic imbalance, etc. All this is a part of globalisation of the world economy, many people sense that this progression cannot be clogged.
I agree and my opinion to relax this drive, necessary measures should be taken by poor countries such as by offering appropriate compensations to these qualified class. Western countries promote trained people to work, stay, invest and avail their benefits. However, to conclude it is difficult to restrict the immigration of people across the globe but attempts to restrain and address the disproportion can be done by the governments.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-12-31 | camp.vandna@gmail.com | 89 | view |
2019-08-23 | mspoonam | 73 | view |
2018-12-13 | Sasuke0789 | 93 | view |
2018-12-12 | iwat | 73 | view |
2018-11-03 | Sayed Khalil | 56 | view |
- Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information, such as their hobbies and interests, and whether they are married or single. Some people say this information may be relevant and useful. Others disagree. Discuss both these views 56
- You recently received a letter from a friend asking for advice about whether to go to college or to try to get a job. You think he/she should get a job. Write a letter to this friend. In your letter: 1. Say why he/she would not enjoy going to college2. Ex 78
- Write about the following topic:Each year, the crime rate increases.What are the causes of crime and what could be done to prevent this rise in criminal activity?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or exp 61
- Some people think that human history has been a journey from igonrance to knowledge. Others argue that this underestimates the achievements of ancient cultures, and overvalues our achievements. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 67
- A friend who lives in another country has invited you to come and stay with him her on your next holiday You are too busy to accept the invitation Write a letter to your friend In your letter Thank him her for the invitation Explain why you cannot come As 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 73, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...cy to wander from one place to another. Lets understand why people migrate? Every hu...
^^^^
Line 7, column 116, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...s positives and negatives. To highlight some of the points such as good career exposure, es...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1469.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32246376812 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87145624633 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.663043478261 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.4696340753 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.8125 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.25 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.1875 7.06120827912 31% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22049002605 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0591005999627 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0434254298281 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0974762403538 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0547173315504 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.28 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.