Whether organization and club activities are as significant as academic studies?
Whether to focus on studying and being successful in academic studies is important or not, always has been a controversial issue among scholars. Although many people argue that as if this is a general fact that organization and clubs which consider to activities have identical significant of academic studies, I strongly believe that the most important duty of a student is studying and it cannot be compared with anything. Among uncountable reasons that can support from my point of view, I mention two of the most conspicuous ones through following paragraphs.
The first reason that juts out from the mind at the first moment of thinking about this issue is the fact that nothing more than education level cannot be effective on the given person’s future. This has a direct relationship with the salary, prestige and being admired and so forth that cannot be neglected. One example can illustrate this claim. My brother took his Ph.D. degree in management and besides being respectful among his friends and co-workers; he is very cherished by his wife family, whereas they always rely on my brother recommendations and his assistance for accomplishing pivotal issues rather than another son of law or even their son.
Secondly, the time of studying of human is restricted by age, government, money, ability and so forth. In other words, the opportunity for academic studies is not long lasting one. The more suitable age is between eighteen and twenty-eight years old. After that, everyone should look for a suitable job or get married which can have the restricting role. A noteworthiness statistic which is conducted in one of the famous universities of Sydney indicated that average ages of students are about 22 and the oldest student in that university is 32 years old. Whereas at the most organizations like social organization, the healthiest ones of them, people easily can be observed at 60 years old. This shows that people time for attending in universities is more limited than attending in a company of an organization.
To short the long story, according to the aforementioned arguments, there are various reasons that can persuade people to admit nothing can be more valuable than academic studying in student’s lives. But this story was a brief. Obviously, there are extra examples and details that challenge the claim which could not be stated in this debate. All in all, consider to academic studies on the social and individual lives of students and oblige them to have more focuses on this issue while studying at university.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-20 | talelaldabous | 76 | view |
| 2019-04-05 | moath322 | 78 | view |
| 2019-03-03 | vakaka | 60 | view |
| 2019-01-02 | emadifahimeh@gmail.com | 70 | view |
| 2018-12-31 | emadifahimeh@gmail.com | 73 | view |
- Independent writing TPO26Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents’ jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents’ job. Use specific reasons 73
- Integrated writing TPO41 33
- Integrated writing TPO 25 81
- Integrated TPO 22 80
- TPO 46- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The opinions of celebrities, such as famous entertainers and athletes, are more important to younger people than they are to older people. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answ 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, if, look, second, secondly, so, whereas, while, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2144.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 421.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09263657957 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52971130743 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.884439925 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546318289786 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 672.3 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.0596957002 48.9658058833 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.111111111 100.406767564 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3888888889 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.61111111111 5.45110844103 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186562043394 0.236089414692 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0552775564509 0.076458572812 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0874201531732 0.0737576698707 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128316088353 0.150856017488 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121508074132 0.0645574589148 188% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 11.7677419355 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 86.8835125448 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.