The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitor how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table and the charts provide information regarding the number of people who visited Ashdown Museum as well as the assessments of them about the quality of Museum in the year before and the year after it was innovated.
It is obvious that there was an upward trend of the figure for visitors in this place during two periods. Moreover, the rate of positive feedbacks rapidly increased with an impressive number.
To be specific, Ashdown Museum used to have only 74000 guests in the prior year it was redecorated. However, when the quality of this palace improved, there was a significant increase in the number of visitors, which peaked at 92000. It was a remarkable figure for a museum. In addition, rising guests came along with positive feedbacks. To illustrate, the proportion of satisfied comments dramatically jumped to 75% in the year after, with 35% of very satisfied replies and 40% of satisfied replies. This is a clear evidence that the quality of Museum's service considerably developed.
In contrast, the figure for bad feedbacks decreased by 5%, which was about 10% in the year before and came down to 5% in the year after. Besides, there still was a small number a people, who did not give any replies regarding the quality of Museum' services (about 5%).
- Some people said the government should not spend money on building theatres and sports stadiums Instead it should spend money on medical care and education Do you agree or disagree 42
- Individuals can do nothing to improve our environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 74
- Eating fastfood 61
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 89
- Total time of phone calls 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, moreover, regarding, still, well, in addition, in contrast, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1058.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87557603687 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65822334097 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543778801843 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 329.4 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.7204324103 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.1818181818 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7272727273 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.36363636364 5.23603664747 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310739822821 0.215688989381 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108045812206 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0746180173153 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194456856767 0.15604864568 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0503830457362 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.