It is observed that in many countries not enough students are choosing to study science subject. What are causes? And what will be effects on society?
It is widely perceived that pupils have a tendency neglect science major when choosing courses to study at school. There are some underlying reasons for this phenomenon which leads to detrimental effects on society.
Science major is not chosen as student’s field for two main reasons below. First and foremost, science area was believed that requiring a lot of diligence as well as a great deal of patience and intelligence. Chemistry, for example, request researchers both industriousness and careful which not all people possess. Therefore, there was a number of students reluctant chose science area following parent’s orientation without any interest. Another reason is that people who chase science subject also have to devote more time than humanities or business students. This is because these major require time not only in learning theoretical lessons but also in doing researches.
This practice results in some deleterious influences on the public. One of the most significant impacts is that the imbalance in the future workforce. This is due to the fact that a vast majority of employees work in other fields such as humanities, business or economics. Furthermore, when the number of science researchers decreases that means human will face up to unwanted challenges in science fields. Take health to exemplify this obstacle, people will lack human resources in finding a cure for some deadly diseases like cancer.
To conclude, a large number of students choose other fields to pursue instead of science because of mental and time demand which they need to devote. This phenomenon brings about adverse impacts on future workforce and exert obstacles for human in science fields.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-10 | truong3011 | 56 | view |
| 2021-07-21 | myhuyenueh94 | 84 | view |
| 2021-07-19 | myhuyenueh94 | 84 | view |
| 2020-08-31 | Saik | 73 | view |
| 2020-03-16 | longpm2k | 73 | view |
- Some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given in the protection of wild animals and birds. Do you agree or disagree about this opinion? 61
- Some people think that schools should reward students who show the best academic results, while others believe that it is more important to reward students who show improvements. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 67
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since there is computer technology To what extent do you agree or disagree 80
- The table below gives information about the problems faced by children in two primary schools in 2005 and 2015. 67
- The graph below compare changes in the birth rates of China and the US between 1920 and 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparisions where relevant 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 14, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...y diseases like cancer. To conclude, a large number of students choose other fields to pursue ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, so, therefore, well, for example, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1447.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37918215613 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83185011569 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.609665427509 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.8506038564 49.4020404114 44% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 96.4666666667 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9333333333 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.86666666667 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130048856282 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0421830289987 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0373949717484 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0846871264044 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0168086963493 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.