Some people say that teachers and parents should decide what assignment or activities children should do after school. Others say that children should make these decisions on their own. Which view do you agree with and why?
It is widely believed that assignments and extracurricular activities are methods that teachers and parents use to assist education for children. They commonly assign missions after a thorough consideration because both teachers and parents want their students or kids can learn as well as they expect. Some experts suggest kids make these decisions on their own due to their personal interests. According to my perspective, however, I do think kids are mature and rational enough to do that.
First and foremost, kids will have less time on studying or other meaningful activities if they can choose what to do in their free time. It should be noted that not all school kids love to study. On the contrary, they love to explore the world around them, paying little attention to their academic work. My cousin, James, is a classic example. His parents have to work on Sundays and allow him to manage his time. Sundays are his playing day when he could watch TV, play video games, hang out with friends, but never study. Without parents and teachers to supervise him, he wastes days to have fun. Thus, some assignments and activities from parents or teachers can help children seize the time.
In addition, some assignments made by children are low-efficiency. Kids, especially young kids, are lack the ability to make their schedules or plans in a scientific way. Some necessary parts, such as proper breaks, diverse activities and reviews may be ignored in children’s plans. In contrast, adults are capable to plan things in a long run. In order to do things effectively and efficiently, it is adults’ supervision that is indispensable for kids.
It is not deniable that kids may dislike the assignments and activities form parents and teachers and then do the opposite things of that. However, in light of the above-mentioned possibility, I suggest that when parents and teachers help kids to make decisions, they should never forget children’s interests and willingness.
Negotiations and communications should be made to assign a suitable plan. Focusing on studying is a bad idea. Thus, this practice will leave nothing to be worried about.
In conclusion, children are too young to decide what to do after school. The help from parents and teachers can let them take fuller advantages of time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-09 | djgjdkncsajf | 70 | view |
| 2018-01-19 | EELLeeee | 70 | view |
| 2017-08-24 | zenith222 | 37 | view |
| 2017-06-28 | Viviandudu | 76 | view |
- Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer while others are in favour of th 89
- 4 The bar chart below shows the average monthly maximum temperatures for three Australian cities in the year 2016 73
- Some people believe that hobbies need to be difficult to be enjoyable To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- People now can better protect the environment than they could in the past 42
- Which is better for children’s education: 9-month study and 3-month break or 3-month study and 1-month break? 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 109, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...s are methods that teachers and parents use to assist education for children. They ...
^^^
Line 5, column 151, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a scientific way" with adverb for "scientific"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...bility to make their schedules or plans in a scientific way. Some necessary parts, such as proper b...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, so, then, thus, well, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, as well as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 13.8261648746 159% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1948.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 381.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11286089239 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90063417292 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538057742782 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 583.2 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.6596370653 48.9658058833 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.1666666667 100.406767564 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.875 20.6045352989 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 5.45110844103 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.53405017921 132% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.341067962676 0.236089414692 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0877392613608 0.076458572812 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0704571950638 0.0737576698707 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172501157207 0.150856017488 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0584440897497 0.0645574589148 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 11.7677419355 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.