It is difficult for people who live in cities to get enough physical exercise. What are the causes and what solutions could be taken to solve the problem?
Globally, the importance of avoiding leading a sedentary lifestyle has been recognised by an increasing number of people, while urban residents tend to have less physical exercise. This essay will look at the possible causes of the issue and practical measures that could be taken by people to deal with it.
The main factor contributing to less physical exercise for city dwellers is the jobs that require them to stay in front of the screen for hours. In metropolitan areas where a majority of employees are working as office clerks, it is difficult for them to stand up and stretch during workdays, thereby lessening the chances to have sufficient exercise. In addition, lacking places, including parks, stadiums and sports courts, suppresses people’s willingness to do physical exercise when they have spare time. Thus, city residents tend to have reduced sports time.
Companies and the government can work collaboratively to encourage urban people to have more physical workouts. If employers are willing to pay for breaks during workdays, providing staff with opportunities to have a 10-minutes stroll, or quip offices with free gym rooms, employees would be more active with all the accessible exercising chances. At the same time, the government should organise and develop cities with more well-established infrastructure, so people are able to do more outdoor exercise.
In conclusion, this essay has discussed the reasons why it is difficult for urban residents to have enough physical exercise, namely the sedentary working style and the limited choices of sports facilities, and the possible solution for the problem. All over the world, people in metropolitan areas will become much healthier with increasing physical exercise if employers and the government are able to provide more resources.
- The diagrams below show how houses can be protected in areas which are prone to flooding 78
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Not all family members are having meals together in everyday bases Why Positive or negative 87
- Giving aid to poorer countries has more negative effects than the positive effects To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The way a person dress reflects his/her characters. 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, so, thus, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1539.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41901408451 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90590679253 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566901408451 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.3229673122 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.909090909 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8181818182 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.63636363636 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216657770701 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0841928049734 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0479851545884 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136471173226 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.035840838709 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.