At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people.
Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages?
The structure of the population is significantly important for every country because it can really make a difference in the development at present and in the future. Some experts hold their minds that the younger people, the healthier economy the brighter future. In my point of view, a big proportion of young adults does have more pros than cons.
It is undeniable that increasing the young brings more intensive competition in one country, which is definitely a bad thing for the generation. In fact, there are fewer opportunities for the younger generation because artificial intelligence has taken some jobs that people can take over after the seniors' retirement. If a country has a larger number of young adults compared with that of the elderly, the unemployment rate may be much higher. In this case, the curse from more twenties in one region does impact badly.
Although the above view can hold water, the advantages come out with younger people still suppress its drawbacks. Nowadays, while people who are seeking jobs are more and more, new jobs can be created. Those who stretch out own business or make out a noble product are most freshmen. Some jobs, such as couches, bank clerk and accountants, may disappear, but new industries are still booming with the great need of staff. Normally, young people have a better ability to adjust that elderly in the period of change, and they will be the fresh energy for the development.
In conclusion, every cloud has its silver lining. Even though there are some issues bringing with a relatively larger population of young people, they could be solved by the young themselves. Only dose newborns a country have, it can have a fast and long-lasting thrive.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-09-18 | underscores | 67 | view |
2019-09-03 | Monika Goswami | 73 | view |
2019-08-30 | Android | 73 | view |
2018-11-12 | EELLeeee | 78 | view |
2018-08-05 | abhikaus92 | 84 | view |
- 13 Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- TPO 41 86
- 19 The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in Panama City from 2010 to 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people think that young people should spend more of their free time at home with their families and spend less time entertaining outside Others disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 87
- Which is better for children’s education: 9-month study and 3-month break or 3-month study and 1-month break? 90
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, really, so, still, while, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1435.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98263888889 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66536200362 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590277777778 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.0434305927 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.6666666667 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.73333333333 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185429974325 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0560627553892 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0616826621661 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114179088822 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0369818830329 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.