As said by someone, a picture can speak thousand words. That is, a pictorial representation of news articles are easier to grasp and comprehend. In my opinion, pictures are needed to catch the initial attention of the reader. There are many reasons that can be given in support of this.
First, in today's world where people are occupied with their personal and professional lives, a viewer needs to be attracted towards a news item so that he will spare some time and dwell into the details. In this case, a picture is the best tool to catch the attention of the viewer and if it interest's him then he will be glued to that piece till he finishes it completely.
Secondly, for some people reading can be a mundane task. In this case, the picture will help in articulating the content and the reader will like to go over the content. This hold true in the case where someone who is not well versed with the reading part of the language. A picture can help this person to understand the report easily while reading the details.
Thirdly, sometimes the news agency want to build an opinion of the reader. A picture can help in forming that preconceive notion about an article. Further when the reader or viewer starts to get into details, he already has the opinion build-up and will agree to the thought process of the writer. That is a connect is formed between the reader and the writer, right from the word go.
Fourthly, the numbers of news agencies and companies have increased considerably. And to survive in a stiff competition, the companies need to capture the maximum viewership percentage. This drives the companies to use methods which make a news article interesting and grab the market share of viewership.
To summarize, a picture can be used to provide a gist or it can even evoke a thought in the mind of the reader. Grabbing the eyeballs of the viewer is the need of the hour for the people in the news making business.
- It is more harmful to compromise one's own beliefs than to adhere to them.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting 54
- Although innovations such as video, computers, and the Internet seem to offer schools improved methods for instructing students, these technologies all too often distract from real learning.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agr 54
- Claim: Any piece of information referred to as a fact should be mistrusted, since it may well be proven false in the future.Reason: Much of the information that people assume is factual actually turns out to be inaccurate.Write a response in which you dis 83
- About us 33
- write a letter recommendation for one of your students. 16
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 41, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a thousand'.
Suggestion: a thousand
...As said by someone, a picture can speak thousand words. That is, a pictorial representat...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 306, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on of the viewer and if it interests him then he will be glued to that piece till...
^^
Line 7, column 307, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... thought process of the writer. That is a connect is formed between the reader and the wr...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, secondly, so, then, third, thirdly, well, while, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1605.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 346.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6387283237 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53771215067 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517341040462 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 2.52805611222 396% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6606071332 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.4736842105 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2105263158 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.26315789474 7.06120827912 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152514711682 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0509142994847 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0255704554931 0.0667982634062 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0811166249526 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0227668093887 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.0946893788 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 50.2224549098 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 11.3001002004 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 12.4159519038 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.