Mass media influence on people
Recently, the phenomenon of social media and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of digital revolution is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that high technology can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the social and cultural standpoint, news services can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that strict censorship, as well as the press conference, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered digital broadcast. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both the pervasive influence of the media and commuting tools apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of psychology, the entertainment industry might increase the consequences of severely traumatized. Moreover, fundamental aspects of wasting people's time relate to this reality that the shaping people's ideas pertain to political propaganda. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of changing the lifestyle is correlated negatively with prime time. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of the common good.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of increased speed of communication far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of socio-economic developments prove the significance of providing easy access to information, but also pinpoint other technologies implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-04 | SATHISH KUMAR B | 72 | view |
| 2022-07-13 | Nawal Fatima | 11 | view |
| 2022-04-08 | amolsharma44 | 80 | view |
| 2022-01-19 | bilalaslam239@gmail.com | 70 | view |
| 2022-01-19 | bilalaslam239@gmail.com | 70 | view |
- The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in the future. Do you agree or disagree? 88
- The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in the future. Do you agree or disagree? 88
- Euthanasia 77
- Parents are responsible for the behavior of the children. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 85
- The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in the future. Do you agree or disagree? 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1495.0 1207.87684729 124% => OK
No of words: 260.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.75 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.3345488415 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 139.433497537 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.684615384615 0.580463131201 118% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 379.143842365 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8159824575 50.4703680194 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.583333333 104.977214359 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108131734026 0.242375264174 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0329577646912 0.0925447433944 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0594712218405 0.071462118173 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0489654833899 0.151781067708 32% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0318158205764 0.0609392437508 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.07 11.5310837438 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.24 8.32886699507 135% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 55.0591133005 196% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.