The line graph below show the population size birth and death rate of ENgland and Whales from 1700 to 2000

Essay topics:

The line graph below show the population size ,birth and death rate of ENgland and Whales from 1700 to 2000.

The given graph depicts, the three categories ( size,birth and death rate ) were in two countries between 1700-2000.

According to the graph , the population size was increased and death rate was dropped. In 1700 year was started population size. Between 1700- 1750 year was sharply increasing and in 1800 year fallen down. In 1950 year was rapidly rised. Birth rate and death rate was started in the same year. In 1700 year birth rate And death rate was similarly climbed. From 1750- 1800 year was shown remained stable. Birth rate in 1800 year was dramatically declined in 1850 year. On the other hand , in 1950 year was gone up. Death rate was step by step fallen down in 2000 year. In conclusion, these types of three categories were stated in 1700 year. The population size was increased and death rate was gone down. England and whales were represented birth rate and death rate was opposed in 1950 year.

Votes
Average: 7 (12 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-05-01 PRAMODH k 73 view
2019-10-24 japneet 56 view
2019-07-30 Jagdeep sahota 67 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 46, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...iven graph depicts, the three categories size,birth and death rate were in two c...
^^
Line 1, column 52, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , birth
...raph depicts, the three categories size,birth and death rate were in two countries b...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 73, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ee categories size,birth and death rate were in two countries between 1700-2000....
^^
Line 3, column 23, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...en 1700-2000. According to the graph , the population size was increased and d...
^^
Line 3, column 486, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...declined in 1850 year. On the other hand , in 1950 year was gone up. Death rate wa...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
similarly, in conclusion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 7.0 243% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 751.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78343949045 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27857043614 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 69.0 106.607317073 65% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.43949044586 0.547539520022 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 204.3 283.868780488 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 11.0 22.4926829268 49% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.0470803637 43.030603864 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 53.6428571429 112.824112599 48% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 11.2142857143 22.9334400587 49% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 3.07142857143 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 1.13902439024 702% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296882297521 0.215688989381 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149065322399 0.103423049105 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106647098106 0.0843802449381 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.289926818691 0.15604864568 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0312828136319 0.0819641961636 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 6.7 13.2329268293 51% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 85.69 61.2550243902 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 4.0 10.3012195122 39% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.26 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.9 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 11.4329268293 44% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.4 10.9970731707 58% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.