Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere.
Do yoy agree or disagree?
Government want to da usefull things to their own country. And they want to give best things to all human beings not art gallerythey want to support anothet human works. In my opinion, i strongly agree that situation.
It is first necessary to expalin, at the present government spent lots of moneys various art exhibition. Thus, all nations have didderent problems and they want to solve that problems. Government can give more benefits to people. Obviously, all people want to live cappy camper Without diseases. government should more money spend to hospitals. Moreover , initially consider all people live better healthy life.
In addition, secondly government might be to nutrious foods. A further point, spend more money to better goods. Explicitly, scholling childrens addicted to eat fast foods and junk foods. Admittedly, large proportions face to various struggles. Therefore want to lose their matters. Not only but also, goverment should suply money these matters. They have the giggest responsibility how to lookafter their country people and stick to correctly peossess. As well as, schools want ti handle better charity works and sporta. However, government school want to supply these categories.
In conclusion, money want to spend better works not unnecessary works. In my opinion, goverment spend more money for better works.
- The chart below shows the male and female internet users aged 15 24 in Canada in 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 55
- Some people think that rich countries should support poor countries in terms of aid for hralth care and education What extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The charts below give information on the ages of the population of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050. 67
- The graph below shows average co2 emission per person in the United Kingdom,Sweden , Italy and Protugal between 1967- 2007. 56
- The graph below shows the consumption of three spared from 1981- 2007 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 12, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Government) must be used with a third-person verb: 'wants'.
Suggestion: wants
Government want to da usefull things to their own count...
^^^^
Line 1, column 77, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'give the best'.
Suggestion: give the best
... to their own country. And they want to give best things to all human beings not art gall...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 34, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n. It is first necessary to expalin, at the present government spent lots of ...
^^
Line 3, column 298, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Government
... to live cappy camper Without diseases. government should more money spend to hospitals. M...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 355, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... more money spend to hospitals. Moreover , initially consider all people live bett...
^^
Line 5, column 245, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... proportions face to various struggles. Therefore want to lose their matters. Not only bu...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 13.1623246493 15% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1145.0 1615.20841683 71% => OK
No of words: 210.0 315.596192385 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45238095238 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 4.20363070211 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6739267612 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 176.041082164 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.614285714286 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 330.3 506.74238477 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 10.0 20.2975951904 49% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 19.9606487871 49.4020404114 40% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 57.25 106.682146367 54% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 10.5 20.7667163134 51% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 7.25 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224715659329 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0694990415907 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0568987805345 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141529646998 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0410412416469 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.0946893788 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.33 50.2224549098 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.3001002004 64% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.85 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 9.78957915832 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.0 10.1190380762 59% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.