The graph below gives information about the main purposes of overseas residents visit in the uk between 200- 2016.
The line graph depicts, the four main causes migration to the overseas residents in Britain from 2000- 2016.
According to the graph, a large proportion visited in holiday while, a tiny portion purposes miscellaneous. On the other hand, holiday , business and visit friends or relatives wee stared in 200 year and visited quantity under 10 ,000 whereas , miscellaneous was migrated under 5000. Obviously, holiday visited person was represented fluctuated gradually , business purpose was dropped between 2008- 2010 and soared respectively. Conversely , business and visit friends or relatives were represented approximately same in throughout the period. Although , miscellaneous illustrated increased slightly and fallen down steadily while in 2014 year was indicated remained stable end of the period. Overall, most population purpose was holiday and the few people's were visited to the micsellaneous. On the contrary , miscellaneous another purposes. In 2010 year was business and visit friend or relatives shown roughly same faction .
- The pie chart below shows tge results of a survey of the causes foor poor learning outcomes in schools in a particularly country in 2011. 56
- Many people believe that social networking sites (such as Facebook) have had a huge negative impact on both individuals and society.To what extent do you agree? 73
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six ares of the world 49
- The graph below shows total internet users in Vietnan from 2003 to the second quarter 2012. 22
- The line graph below shows the case of diseases caused by x virus in Australia from 1960 to 1995. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 135, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...iscellaneous. On the other hand, holiday , business and visit friends or relatives...
^^
Line 3, column 230, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...n 200 year and visited quantity under 10 ,000 whereas , miscellaneous was migrated...
^^
Line 3, column 243, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...d visited quantity under 10 ,000 whereas , miscellaneous was migrated under 5000. ...
^^
Line 3, column 356, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...son was represented fluctuated gradually , business purpose was dropped between 20...
^^
Line 3, column 442, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...2010 and soared respectively. Conversely , business and visit friends or relatives...
^^
Line 3, column 555, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... same in throughout the period. Although , miscellaneous illustrated increased sli...
^^
Line 3, column 602, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ellaneous illustrated increased slightly and fallen down steadily while in 2014 y...
^^
Line 3, column 812, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ed to the micsellaneous. On the contrary , miscellaneous another purposes. In 2010...
^^
Line 3, column 929, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... or relatives shown roughly same faction .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, so, whereas, while, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 33.7804878049 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 884.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 151.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.85430463576 4.92477711251 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.50545371207 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07987976218 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.64238410596 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.496826497 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.2222222222 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7777777778 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 5.23603664747 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 9.0 1.69756097561 530% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195465961447 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0813185507177 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0684206604391 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181107581883 0.15604864568 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.048588137573 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 61.2550243902 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.35 11.4140731707 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.