The argument that the Palean baskets were not uniquely Palean is deeply flawed and not found accurate as the description of the Palean design is highly vague and there is lack of evidence to prove that the newly discovered basket was Palean or not.
The argument doesn't have clear specifications for what it actually means by a Palean basket, Palean boat or largely a distictive Palean design under the roof of which it is tagging the items to belog to the Palean category. The fact that the baskets were found in the immediate vicinity of the pre-historic village of Palea is not sufficient to indicate that they were a result of the craftsmanship of the people of Palea. To be able to decide whether the Palean baskets were uniquely Palean or not, the argument should first lay clear instructions for what kind of designs it specifies to be Palean.
Moreover, even if we believe that the basket discoverd in Lithos was a Palean basket, the argument is flawed to explain that it was not crafted by the people of Palea. According to the argument, no Palean boats were found which is not a ground enough to judge whether the basket was Palean or not. The first reason is the argument doesn't lay guidelines about how it differentiates a boat which it found, to be non-palean. Another reason is ihat, even if we assume according to the argument that no Palean boat was found it might be because, the people of Palea crossed the river using a boat, crafted the baskets, sold them or whatever and then came back to their village using the same boat.
The argument makes several unwarranted assumptions due to which it fails to build a convincing case of why the so-called Palean baskets were not uniquely Palean.
- An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be p 82
- Claim: Even though young people often receive the advice to “follow your dreams,” more emphasis should be placed on picking worthy goals.Reason: Many people’s dreams are inherently selfish.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which 62
- "Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia andconcluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire villagerather than by their own biological parents. However, my recent interviews with c 23
- Some people believe that teaching morality should be the foundation of education. Others believe that teaching a foundation of logical reasoning would do more to produce a moral society.Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns 50
- The following appeared in a letter from the faculty committee to the president of Seatown University:A study conducted at nearby Oceania University showed that faculty retention is higher when professors are offered free tuition at the university for thei 39
Essay evaluation report
Sentence: The argument doesn't have clear specifications for what it actually means by a Palean basket, Palean boat or largely a distictive Palean design under the roof of which it is tagging the items to belog to the Palean category.
Error: belog Suggestion: below
Error: distictive Suggestion: distinctive
Sentence: Moreover, even if we believe that the basket discoverd in Lithos was a Palean basket, the argument is flawed to explain that it was not crafted by the people of Palea.
Error: discoverd Suggestion: discovered
Sentence: Another reason is ihat, even if we assume according to the argument that no Palean boat was found it might be because, the people of Palea crossed the river using a boat, crafted the baskets, sold them or whatever and then came back to their village using the same boat.
Error: ihat Suggestion: what
-------------------
argument 1 -- not OK
argument 2 -- not OK
-------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: ? out of 6
Category: Poor Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 4 2
No. of Sentences: 9 15
No. of Words: 303 350
No. of Characters: 1385 1500
No. of Different Words: 127 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.172 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.571 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.508 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 99 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 59 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 39 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 20 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 33.667 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.932 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.556 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.524 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.712 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.202 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 14, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...sket was Palean or not. The argument doesnt have clear specifications for what it a...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 225, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... items to belog to the Palean category. The fact that the baskets were found in the...
^^^
Line 5, column 332, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...r not. The first reason is the argument doesnt lay guidelines about how it differentia...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, if, moreover, so, then, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.6327345309 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 12.9520958084 15% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 11.1786427146 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 13.6137724551 81% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 28.8173652695 69% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 55.5748502994 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 10.0 16.3942115768 61% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1416.0 2260.96107784 63% => OK
No of words: 301.0 441.139720559 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70431893688 5.12650576532 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.56307096286 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54077030368 2.78398813304 91% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 204.123752495 65% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.441860465116 0.468620217663 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 445.5 705.55239521 63% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 4.96107784431 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.76447105788 91% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 19.7664670659 46% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 22.8473053892 144% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.8936579219 57.8364921388 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 157.333333333 119.503703932 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.4444444444 23.324526521 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.70786347227 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.20758483034 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 6.88822355289 102% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.67664670659 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196795833508 0.218282227539 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107179081715 0.0743258471296 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0455737394394 0.0701772020484 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135622638531 0.128457276422 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0440447017357 0.0628817314937 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 14.3799401198 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.44 48.3550499002 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 12.197005988 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 12.5979740519 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.32208582834 101% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 98.500998004 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 12.3882235529 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 11.1389221557 136% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.9071856287 126% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.