A job with more vacation time but a low salary is better than a job with a higher salary but less vacation time.
The answer to this question can be varied from person to person. In my opinion, the benefit of having a job whit higher salary and less vacation outweigh a job with a low salary and less vacation. There are some reasons, the most outstanding of which will be discussed in the ensuing paragraphs.
Firstly, nowadays, the cost of living is becoming more and more and people have a lot of problems to meet their basic needs such as paying bills, housing, buying cars and they do not have enough time to have a vacation. In fact, if people have a decent job with a higher salary, they are able to pay their important expenses easily. An example will illustrate this viewpoint much better. When I was a bachelor student, I had a part-time job in university campus magazine as a reporter. One time, I had an interview with the professor Nejati who is a well-known professor in my country. Then he said that based on his experience and research, a high percentage of people who have a job with a lower salary, are the ones who can not spend money on their vacation because their saved money is not enough. He also argues that those people are always suffering from having lower money in their lives mentally. As a result, I strongly believe that people who have more money are satisfied with their lifestyle.
Secondly, people earning more money are able to provide a situation which brings them more facilities because vacation is just one aspect of life among a myriad of aspects. As a matter of fact, other needs are prior to having a vacation. So, by having a high salary job, they have less difficulty in their lives in order to make their lives better. Hence, they can contribute positively to their family members through buying a car and also a house for them. For example, There was a time that I had decided to continue my study at over sea’s university. Subsequently, In order to pay my tuition, I need to pay them. I had spoken with my father and he said me there is no problem and support you all the time. Until this incident occurred did I realize the importance of a job with higher salary. Thus, had my father have a job with a lower salary, He would not have supported me.
In conclusion, no one can deny the enormous effects of having higher salary on people's life. Not only are they able to experience a better quality of life, but also they can assist their family members easily.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-14 | pinkruo | 73 | view |
| 2018-02-07 | Mehrdad.imn | 70 | view |
| 2018-02-07 | Mehrdad.imn | 70 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Working at home usingcomputers or telephones is better than working in the office. 70
- it is easier to family member to become successful in their lives than the past 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement. Movies and televisionhave more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave. 76
- it is better to have a secure job 60
- If people have the opportunity to get a secure job, they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 658, Rule ID: SAY_TELL[2]
Message: 'Say' cannot be followed by a direct personal object. Did you mean 'told'?
Suggestion: told
...hem. I had spoken with my father and he said me there is no problem and support you ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 716, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Until” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...o problem and support you all the time. Until this incident occurred did I realize th...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, then, thus, well, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a matter of fact, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1976.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 435.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.54252873563 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56690854021 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46292203258 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.473563218391 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 646.2 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4162032426 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.8181818182 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7727272727 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.77272727273 5.45110844103 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311989986825 0.236089414692 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0928814150424 0.076458572812 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107244116182 0.0737576698707 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210128967988 0.150856017488 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.089139058716 0.0645574589148 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 11.7677419355 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.05 10.9000537634 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.