The Human Mind Will Always Be Superior To Machines Because Machines Are Only Tools Of Human Minds.
The machines are inferior to the human mind, but to suppose this will always be the case is too extreme and hence I partially agree to the issue.
One thing to consider before discussing the issue is the vague terminology of superiority. Superiority could be judged on various parameters like productivity, efficiency, decision making, creative thinking and thus, is a subjective notion.
If superiority is judged on the basis of creative thinking and coming with possible solutions to various challenges then certainly there is no match for the efficacy of the human mind. Machines have been developed as a tool to reduce human efforts and solve trivial problems. These machines don’t possess the effective thinking capability and decision making as possessed by the human brain. Take the example of the Autopilot mode in the airplanes. This mode when enabled can carry on the trajectory set on by the pilots without any obstruction. This enables pilots to take much needed breaks in between. However, the autopilot mode is not equipped in making decision and unlocking the creative prowess, as the brains of human, when facing a critical situation during accidents etc. We are still dependent on the pilots to overcome these challenges. Hence, the human mind is definitely superior to the machines in decision making and creative processes.
On the other hand, If superiority is judged according to the productivity and efficiency of the work, then the notion that human mind will always prevail will be fallacious. Consider the example of the domination of machines in the production processes in various industries. Machines have supplanted the use of human labour because they are able to produce work in sheer volumes which couldn’t have been possible with human labour. Also, these machines are infalliable and impeccable in the task assigned to them which is not matched by their human counterparts. Hence, the human mind regardless of its many gifts can’t achieve these standards of machines.
Regardless of the superiority of human brains in critical decision making and creative thought process, to say that the machines will never be able to match our superiority is too extreme. The fields of artificial intelligence and machine learning are advancing at a very rapid pace and can possibly in future attribute the properties like decision making and creative thinking in these machines.
To conclude, there is no question of the superiority of human mind over machines in relation to critical thinking and creative processes. But to suggest that this will always remain the case is somewhat prognostic as recent advances in technology are promising to develop a machine which can function similarly to the human brain in future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | shoeb_athar | 83 | view |
| 2020-01-14 | DH123 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | arjun2112 | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | ajay yadav | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-26 | Nithin Narla | 50 | view |
- The Human Mind Will Always Be Superior To Machines Because Machines Are Only Tools Of Human Minds. 66
- 'The following appeared in a magazine article about planning for retirement. "Clearview should be a top choice for anyone seeking a place to retire, because it has spectacular natural beauty and a consistent climate. Another advantage is that housing cos 69
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 288, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'can'.
Suggestion: can
... are advancing at a very rapid pace and can possibly in future attribute the properties like...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 248, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...nostic as recent advances in technology are promising to develop a machine which can function...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 331, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...n function similarly to the human brain in future.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, similarly, so, still, then, thus, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 58.6224719101 116% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2332.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 442.0 442.535393258 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27601809955 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58517132086 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83776071843 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.472850678733 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 754.2 704.065955056 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2153099663 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.047619048 118.986275619 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0476190476 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.90476190476 5.21951772744 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.458678733721 0.243740707755 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139933830539 0.0831039109588 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110866887855 0.0758088955206 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.260995052575 0.150359130593 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11010550752 0.0667264976115 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 100.480337079 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.