The following appeared as a recommendation by a committee planning a ten-year budget for the city of Calatrava.
"The birthrate in our city is declining: in fact, last year's birthrate was only one-half that of five years ago. Thus the number of students enrolled in our public schools will soon decrease dramatically, and we can safely reduce the funds budgeted for education during the next decade. At the same time, we can reduce funding for athletic playing fields and other recreational facilities. As a result, we will have sufficient money to fund city facilities and programs used primarily by adults, since we can expect the adult population of the city to increase."
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
In the argument, the author recommends reallocating educational, athletics and other recreational facilities funds for other facilities and programs primarily for adults. The argument is unconvincing for multiple reasons.
Firstly, the author makes a bold assumption that declining birth rate will significantly decrease the number of students enrolled in public schools. It is highly possible that Calatrava has very few public schools. Hence, the declining birth rate will effectively have no effect in the number of students eligible for admission.
Secondly, the author takes it for granted that the birth rate will continue declining for the next ten years. There are good chances that this might not happen. Also, reducing funds budgeted for education can seriously hamper the quality of education. It might indirectly affect the students’ academic future.
In addition, the proposal to reduce funding for athletic playing fields and other recreational facilities is absurd. Although the possibility that these facilities used by adults is significantly low, it does not justify the reduced funding. What if these facilities are state of the art? What if these facilities have produced world-class sportsmen in the past?
Lastly, the author is of the opinion that adult population would increase in the next decade. It is assumed that declining birth rate is the primary cause for the same. Reallocating funds for facilities and programs used by adults based on this assumption is unjustified. It is likely that adults may not have time, energy or financial ability to use the same.
To conclude, the argument is weak. It is based solely on bold assumptions that may or may not be true.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2013-11-10 | nilka61 | 77 | view |
2013-10-18 | smartaquarius10 | 64 | view |
2013-07-19 | rockingboy | 63 | view |
2013-05-28 | galitb84 | 73 | view |
2013-04-07 | utkarshece | 79 | view |
- Several charitable organizations in Pleasantville provide opportunities for teenagers to engage in community service. These organizations have a great need for volunteers, but in recent years, the number of teenage volunteers has significantly declined.Th 70
- Technology, while apparently aimed to simplify our lives, only makes our lives more complicated.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In dev 70
- A recent sales study indicates that consumption of seafood dishes in Bay City restaurants has increased by 30 percent during the past five years. Yet there are no currently operating city restaurants whose specialty is seafood. Moreover, the majority of f 65
- The following appeared as a recommendation by a committee planning a ten-year budget for the city of Calatrava."The birthrate in our city is declining: in fact, last year's birthrate was only one-half that of five years ago. Thus the number of students en 63
- The following appeared in a memo from the new vice president of Sartorian, a company that manufactures men's clothing."Five years ago, at a time when we had difficulties in obtaining reliable supplies of high quality wool fabric, we discontinued productio 73
flaws:
No. of Words: 267 350
No. of Different Words: 139 200
Avg. Sentence Length: 14.053 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 4.785 7.5
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 19 15
No. of Words: 267 350
No. of Characters: 1390 1500
No. of Different Words: 139 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.042 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.206 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.771 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 105 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 79 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 63 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 38 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 14.053 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 4.785 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.526 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.29 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.586 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.06 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 6 5