The graph makes a comparison of the average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per citizen in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal through forty-year-period from 1967 to 2007.
It is apparent from the data supplies that, while the carbon dioxide emission in the United Kingdom and Sweden had decreased gradually, the Italian and Portuguese had released CO2 in the same period.
In accordance with the line graph, both the United Kingdom and Sweden people witnessed a drop in carbon dioxide emission. With regards to the United Kingdom, it was first had the highest amount of carbon dioxide discharge which constituted with 10 metric tonnes of CO2 in 1967, it then fell down slightly to approximately 9 metric tonnes in 2007. However, the amount of carbon dioxide released of Sweden had a different tendency, to be more specific, it first accounted for about 8.5 metric tonnes in 1967 and then it suddenly reached its peak of over 10 metric tonnes after ten years before dramatically dropping to about 6 metric tonnes in 2007.
When it comes to the other two countries, Portugal had the lowest amount of carbon dioxide emissions per people which contributes to about 1 metric tonnes, after that this country witnessed a sharp rise in the amount of emission and gradually increased until it reached 5 metric tonnes in 2007. Having the same tendency, the Italian discharged about 4 metric tonnes of gases in 1967 and increased by 3 metric tonnes which stand for 7 metric tonnes in the last year.
- The diagram below shows how coffee is produced and prepared for sale in supermarkets and shops 84
- What is the role of advertisement in the modern world? 88
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comp 59
- The graph below shows four countries of residence of overseas students in Australia. 73
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s. 90
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, then, while, in brief
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1189.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 241.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93360995851 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58998625926 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.49377593361 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 354.6 283.868780488 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 22.4926829268 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.0489933728 43.030603864 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 169.857142857 112.824112599 151% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.4285714286 22.9334400587 150% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216829935495 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136861614853 0.103423049105 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111691592401 0.0843802449381 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183500813307 0.15604864568 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116038616504 0.0819641961636 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 13.2329268293 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.43 61.2550243902 74% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.3012195122 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.91 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.9970731707 142% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.