The line graph demonstrates the occupancy of visitor arrival for education in Australia, who were from four others nations Hong Kong, Malaysia, Indonesia, and Singapore.
It is apparent from the data supplied that Australian witnessed a dramatical rise in the number of foreign students over the period of eighteenth years from 1982 to 2000.
Regarding Malaysia first, this country had the most students who studied in Australia contributing to 5000 in 1982. Its figures were then climbed to 19000s in 1994 before dropping down slightly and standing for 18000s in 2000.
When it comes to Indonesia, although the number of students in this nation coming to Australia for education in the first year was quite low. The figures of this nation had risen significantly over the same period and stayed at approximately 23000 after reaching its peak at over 25000 students.
Considering the others two countries, Singapore and Hong Kong started with the same statistics which nearly zero students studying in Australia. However, from 1987 their figures had considerably changed. While the Singapore pupils who decided to study in Australia had increased 20000 in numbers, the numbers of residence of Hong Kong students fluctuated moderately over the same period and ended with 18000 pupils in 2000.
- The bar chart below shows the number of miles travelled in a year by men and women for six different purposes in a particular country. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and makes comparisons where relevant. 73
- The chart and table below show customer satisfaction levels in the US with airlines and aspects of air travel in 1999, 2000, and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- What is the role of advertisement in the modern world? 88
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. 84
- The chat below give information about Southland's main exports in 2000, 2014, and future projection of 2025. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, regarding, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1112.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39805825243 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70461111682 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592233009709 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 314.1 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6574064025 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.555555556 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8888888889 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.22222222222 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165071001895 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.067307942687 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.056276405207 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0877822453059 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0353672510953 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 11.4140731707 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.