Some people say that government should build sport facilities for professional athletes. Others believe that such facilities should be open to everyone. Discuss both views with your opinion.
Sports uplift the standard of health, wealth and relationships. Presently, few masses assert that authorities should provide specialized sporting amenities to athletes who pursue sports as their careers. By contrast, others argue that such facilities should be available to be utilized by public also. Here, I would like to account for both views with my own perception.
There are manifold points to shore up the former view. First and foremost, governments ought to invest in establishing quality infrastructure for players so as to obtain good results and output from them. For example, in case of athletics, players who practice their track and field events on the grass ground would definitely not be able to perform their best when they are asked to perform on the synthetic grounds at international or even national levels. Hence, providing adequate environment and equipment is the need of the hour so that athletes can bring laurels for the nation. Moreover, sufficient sporting services would allure youngsters to opt for games and sports as their profession. On the contrary, others have conflicting views.
Now there are certain reasons to support the latter view. Initially, opening up the sporting required arenas for public use would no doubts increase the chances of people indulging in games and keeping themselves fit as a fiddle. Adding to it, it will be a boon for the health of the common masses who otherwise may be leading a sedentry lifestyle and thus inviting health problems. Thence, constructing such services for ordinary folks has a great advantage in terms of public health and well being.
From my notion, both aspects have their own significance. Undeniably, administration should be willing to provide specific amenities for training the professional players to excel in their respective sports. However, I still believe that all such facilities should be publicly available for utilization by the masses for the greater good of the society.
To recapitulate, it can be stated that there should be balanced privilege for both the ordinary masses and professional athletes to use the facilities provided by the government.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-02-27 | Rose sandhu12 | 72 | view |
- Some people believe that teaching children at home is best for a child’s development while others think that it is important for children to go to school. Discuss both views with your opinion 84
- Some people believe that mature employees are beneficial to a company. Others think that younger employees contribute more and hence are more beneficial to a company. Discuss both views with your own perception. 89
- Some people think that nowadays children have too much freedom Do you agree or disagree 82
- Some people think that health care should be free for everyone Others think that people should pay for their medical costs themselves Discuss both the views with your own opinion 77
- It is a good idea for teenagers to have jobs while they are still studying. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 297, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...d be available to be utilized by public also. Here, I would like to account for both...
^^^^
Line 3, column 154, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...shing quality infrastructure for players so as to obtain good results and output ...
^^
Line 3, column 156, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...ing quality infrastructure for players so as to obtain good results and output from the...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 422, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... Thence, constructing such services for ordinary folks has a great advantage in ...
^^
Line 9, column 120, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oth the ordinary masses and professional athletes to use the facilities provided ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, then, thus, well, as for, as to, for example, no doubt, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1826.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32361516035 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88040745445 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574344023324 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 545.4 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.6014096 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.444444444 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0555555556 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.22222222222 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320077721349 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0963724257792 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0764709586181 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200054003948 0.151304729494 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0718528068782 0.056905535591 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.