The graph shows consumption of fast food by Australian teenagers in the period from 1975 to 2000.
Overall, consumption of Hamburgers and Pizza steadily increased in the surveyed year. In contrast, Fish and Chips eaten times gradually decreased in the same period.
To be specific, Fish and Chips was the popular food in 1975 with the consumption of just below 100 times, while Hamburgers and Pizza are least popular in the same period with just below 10 times. However, the Fish and Chips consumption is dropped and jumped in between 1975 to 1985, which is about 85 and 90 approximately. Thereafter, it is steadily dropped to below 40 times in 2000. Additionally, Hamburgers consumption sharply raised to just over 80 times in 1985 after that it is reached the highest consumption of over 100 times in 2000. Finally, the number of pizza consumption dramatically increased to just over 80 times in 1995 then it is remained constant up to 200.
- The graph and chart give information and forecast about the vehicle number and CO2 emission in England and Wales between 2000 and 2020. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The graphs below give information about computer ownership as a percentage of the population between 2002 and 2010, and by level of education for the years 2002 and 2010. 67
- Consumption of fast food by Australian teenager 73
- The graph below shows in percentage terms the changing patterns of domestic access to modern technology in homes in the U.K. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 399, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to below 40 times in 2000. Additionally, Hamburgers consumption sharply raised to...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 789.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93125 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82482715179 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 80.0 106.607317073 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 220.5 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9903262669 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.625 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251039314632 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118031619457 0.103423049105 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.165200715404 0.0843802449381 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.242381687753 0.15604864568 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.215416067883 0.0819641961636 263% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.