Some people think that we need to pay higher taxes in order for the government to build basic needs of people. Others say that government should find other ways to get funds for it. What should the government do in your opinion.
The ultimate goal of modern governments is to ensure the rapid progress and safety of their nations. Presently, some people reckon that paying higher taxes is salient to strengthen the financial budget of government so that it can cater all the basic needs of masses. By contrast, others cite that administration should look for other ways to accumulate funds. Here, i would like to account for both sides with my own perception.
There are manifold points to shore up the former view. First and foremost, heavy levy received from public can contribute remarkably to maximize the financial budget of a nation for its betterment. Government of a nation can easily manage the astronomical outlays of transportation, education, health and other sectors. Taking a real life example into consideration, recently, Indian governments has passed out the act of goods service tax known as (GST) in order to boost the financial budget. Funds collected from (GST) and income taxes are supposed to be utilized for the welfare of common people in terms of accommodation, transport, education and medical amenities. Needless to say, the role of surplus taxes to accelerate the rate of development is terrific. On the contrary, others have conflicting views.
They think that inflation has already got on nerves of people in this modern context especially in thriving nations. Therefore, imposition of heavy tax is expected to be backbreaking for common people as they could find it onerous to manage their living expenses. What is more, government of developing nations should invite international companies to set up their branches so that import and export, commercial dealings and employment opportunities could be availed for financial prosperity. It is advisable to make strategies and policies to hike the productivity of workings sectors such as industries, agriculture instead forcing people to pay higher levy.
In my notion, both aspects have their own significance. Undeniable, public funds are a major source of revenue. However, middle and low class people are likely to live miserable lives under this approach and this is highly unjustifiable. Administration needs to promote commercialization, import and export, ways to enhance productivity instead taxing immensely.
To recapitulate, collection of funds is a big deal for governments worldwide. Charging heavy taxes is not the only way to strengthen the budget; governments should explore other alternatives.
- In many countries traditional food is replaced by international fast food. This has adverse effects on families, individuals and the society. Do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion. 55
- Some people believe that countries should invite foreign companies to open their brunches, offices and factories in order to develop their economies. Others think countries should invest in their own companies instead. Discuss both views and give your own 85
- Nowadays many people with families leave their country to work abroad What are the benefits and drawbacks of this trend Give your opinion and include any relevant examples 84
- Popular events like the football world cup and other international sporting occasions are essential in easing international tensions and releasing patriotic emotions in a safe way. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 82
- Some people say that computer games are bad for children by all means others believe that these games are contributing to children s development Discuss both views and give your own opinion 72
Comments
Essay evaluation report
flaws:
the conclusion is somehow duplicated to the fourth paragraph. It can be removed.
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 7.5 out of 9
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 21 15
No. of Words: 383 350
No. of Characters: 2028 1500
No. of Different Words: 227 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.424 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.295 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.998 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 162 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 109 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 83 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 61 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 18.238 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.097 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.381 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.254 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.483 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.018 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 368, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...r other ways to accumulate funds. Here, i would like to account for both sides wi...
^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ntrary, others have conflicting views. They think that inflation has already go...
^^^
Line 5, column 459, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gs and employment opportunities could be availed for financial prosperity. It is ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, so, then, therefore, such as, on the contrary, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2092.0 1615.20841683 130% => OK
No of words: 383.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46214099217 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12851047635 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587467362924 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 651.6 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4306272264 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.619047619 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2380952381 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.28571428571 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.387878859201 0.244688304435 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0950357588294 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0729204282106 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21749490996 0.151304729494 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0975957579575 0.056905535591 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.