Based on the reading material, the author stated that there are 3 viable explanations for the massive extinction occurred at the end of the Triassic period. However, the professor finds this idea bereft of sufficient reasoning and cites some ideas to the contrary.
Initially, the author argued that near the end of the Triassic period, sea levels were fluctuating and the decline of sea levels was the reason of massive extinction owing to the fact it had a profound impact on food supply chains. However, the lecturer refuted this idea by stating that although scientists agree that sea levels were fluctuating at the end of the Triassic period, this changes had occurred gradually. If the declining of the sea levels was the cause of extinction, it must have been occurred abruptly, but it didn't. Therefore, the fluctuating of sea levels doesn't count as a reason for massive extinction.
Another point mentioned by the writer of the reading passage was that volcanoes eruptions had released a considerable amount sulfur dioxide (SO2) into the atmosphere, which made the temperature to fall massive climate cooling. That being said, the professor repudiated this one to by clarifying that sulfur dioxide remains in the atmosphere only for a short time and then it combined with water from rain and comes back to the earth's surface again. If the volcanoes eruption were the cause of extinction, sulfur dioxide must have been remained in the atmosphere for the long time, which is not plausible based on the scientific facts.
The final point discussed by the author was that asteroid striking made a lot of dust that blocked the sun light for many months or even a few years, so most plants died and many animals species starved. Yet again, the professor criticized this idea. She said that the striking of asteroids couldn't be the reason of massive extinction owing to the fact that many craters that made from those collide, are for long time before the massive extinction at the end of the Triassic period. Hence, this reason has nothing to the massive extinction.
- TPO-48 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Because modern life is very complex, it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize. 73
- TPO-48 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Because modern life is very complex, it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize. 73
- TPO-33 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.Use spe 60
- TPO-28 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Parents today are more involved in their children’s education than were parents in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 527, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...ust have been occurred abruptly, but it didnt. Therefore, the fluctuating of sea leve...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 575, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...herefore, the fluctuating of sea levels doesnt count as a reason for massive extinctio...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 454, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'volcanoes'' or 'volcano's'?
Suggestion: volcanoes'; volcano's
...ack to the earths surface again. If the volcanoes eruption were the cause of extinction, ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 180, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'animals'' or 'animal's'?
Suggestion: animals'; animal's
...few years, so most plants died and many animals species starved. Yet again, the profess...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 291, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...She said that the striking of asteroids couldnt be the reason of massive extinction owi...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, so, then, therefore, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 30.3222958057 132% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1723.0 1373.03311258 125% => OK
No of words: 347.0 270.72406181 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96541786744 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57401461654 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 145.348785872 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.492795389049 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 527.4 419.366225166 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.875210207 49.2860985944 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.538461538 110.228320801 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6923076923 21.698381199 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.92307692308 7.06452816374 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.3589403974 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 63.6247240618 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.