The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
The line graph provides information regarding the usage of fish and some various types of meat in European country throughout 25 years from 1979 till 2004. Overall, chicken consumption witnessed an upward trend, while other three choices dropped over the years.
As can be clearly seen from the given information, beef was the most popular with a consumption of 210 grams per person. Then, it plunged to 180 before reaching approximately 230 in 1984. After following twenty years figures for beef dropped slightly until hitting 120. Lamb consumption followed fairly similar trend with beef which stood at 150 grams in 1979 and declined two times to 75 grams in 2004.
Interestingly, although chicken consumption was third most eaten meat at beginning of survey, it increased gradually from about 150 grams and in 2004 it hot a peak of 250. In addition, fish utilized 60 grams per person per week in 1979 and experienced decrease of 10 grams in the final year.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-24 | pateldhruv1708 | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | mary.ssherr | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | manhstorm | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | manhstorm | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-02 | happyhappy | 61 | view |
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade*-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries 67
- The table below gives data on the hour of leisure time per year for people in Someland 81
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Solving environmental problems should be the responsibilities of one international organization instead of state or national governments
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. 78
- The graphs below show the numbers of male and female workers in 1975 and 1995 in several employment sectors of the Republic of Freedonia. 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
regarding, so, then, third, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 803.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98757763975 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62761550794 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.683229813665 0.547539520022 125% => OK
syllable_count: 216.9 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.8738117656 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.375 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.125 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197988601532 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.077597650273 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0852427497277 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144701235857 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0739709332768 0.0819641961636 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.