Law can change human behavior. Do you agree or not?
Recently, the phenomenon of law to change human behavior and its corresponding impact sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many the matter of law enforcement is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that studying the impacts of law on human behavior can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, social and civil regulations can provide the society with some noticeable effects which rooted in the fact that increasing the crime rate, as well as developing discipline, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the influence of law enforcement on human behavior. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both respecting to citizen’s right and the betterment of the community apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of social legislation, observing law might increase the consequences of security in the society. Moreover, fundamental aspects of obtaining stricter rules would relate to this reality that the demerits of behavioral corruption pertain to breaking law. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a tangible university has asserted that the downside of death penalties is correlated negatively to the absence of law. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of unfavorable society.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of law and regulations in the society outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of precise legislation prove the significance of law on human behavior, but also pinpoint legal implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-01 | kamyar.diba | 55 | view |
| 2021-08-01 | kamyar.diba | 55 | view |
| 2021-07-31 | kamyar.diba | 55 | view |
| 2021-07-31 | kamyar.diba | 55 | view |
| 2019-11-05 | yasamin.gharib62 | 88 | view |
- Is tourism in less developed countries advantage or disadvantage? Discuss your views and give your opinion. 85
- Environmental pollution is too alarming to be managed by individuals. Real change can be made at the government level. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 85
- Do you think English will remain a global language despite globalization? Discuss you views with examples. 77
- Xenophobia has accelerated rapidly in the western countries According to you what solutions can be proposed by government and individuals 92
- Law can change human behavior. Do you agree or not? 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1541.0 1207.87684729 128% => OK
No of words: 277.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56317689531 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27070233693 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620938628159 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 379.143842365 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.8623236946 50.4703680194 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.416666667 104.977214359 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0833333333 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316699043307 0.242375264174 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103163996088 0.0925447433944 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0858310591491 0.071462118173 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176609479818 0.151781067708 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0668392072539 0.0609392437508 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 12.6369458128 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 11.5310837438 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.88 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 55.0591133005 194% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.