In many countries, children are engaged in different kinds of paid work. Some people regard this as completely wrong. Others consider it as a valuable work experience, important for learning and taking responsibility. What is your opinion?
Nowadays, the crisis of paid-work children has become a long-running dispute among the public all over the world, which leads to a moot question “whether paid works bring children important work experience and responsibility or not?”. It is a widely held view that preventing vulnerable children from paid-work is highly beneficial, whereas I tend to believe that one must weigh up carefully the pros and cons of this issue.
To begin with, it is a common belief that preventing children to engage at in paid work plays a vital role in the world of cut-throat competition. To put into consideration, I express several reasons why I support this idea. First and foremost is that the majority of children are employed for fewer value works, such as washing dished or cleaning the house without any worthy experience. Secondly, it can be argued that they are often paid less than an adult, while they work like them. In addition to this information, it should be mentioned that they are unable to achieve enough knowledge and in some cases are exploited by employers. A group of scientists, working at a prestigious university conducted that they usually neglect their lessons and are failing the exam.
However, there is no doubt that paid-work children provide people with various positive points. It should be taken into account that working at an early age gives children a sense of self-confidence and independence. Moreover, it is quite clear that they can reinforce social and cognitive skills and promote their interaction with people.
To recapitulate, I firmly believe that toughen prevention in order to stop working children must be taken into consideration. However, as every garden may have some weeds, the local authorities are recommended to enforce stricter legislation, and individuals are hoped to heighten their intellect.
- If you want to study a particular area of climate change, which area/subject will you choose? 11
- Can the Internet replace the classroom teacher? Discuss your views 80
- In most of the education systems, students are assessed by written examinations. Do you think it is a good idea or not? Give your reasons. 85
- The space travel is fantastic these days and people are very fascinated towards it but there are many environmental problems on our planet that need to be resolved first. What is your opinion? Should money be spent on space travel or on environmental issu 78
- Many people think that regions affect successful person. What is your opinion about native region and accomplished person’s influence on the region he belongs to? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 55, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...crisis of paid-work children has become a long-running dispute among the public all over the w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, whereas, while, in addition, no doubt, such as, in some cases, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.5418719212 161% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 33.0 20.9802955665 157% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1563.0 1207.87684729 129% => OK
No of words: 298.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24496644295 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96926017945 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 139.433497537 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620805369128 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.6157635468 173% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.581074775 50.4703680194 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.230769231 104.977214359 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9230769231 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.92307692308 7.25397266985 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242266796817 0.242375264174 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0807009032306 0.0925447433944 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0528574224018 0.071462118173 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141201076218 0.151781067708 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0503894945027 0.0609392437508 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 12.6369458128 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.1260098522 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 11.5310837438 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.32886699507 113% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 55.0591133005 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 77.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.