task 1: the graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004
The line graph illustrates the spending on fish and some various types meat in a European country from 1979 to 2004, a period of 25 years.
Overall, consumption of chicken dramatically increased while amount of beef, lamp and fish declined. Amount of fish always was eaten the least in a European nation.
The biggest consumption in 1979 was beef around 220 gram per person was consumed per week while the lowest consumption in 1979 was fish about 60 grams consumed by a person per week. The mount of beef and lamb decreased more than 50 grams per person per week in a period of 25 years. In the same time, chicken was the best highest spending, which was consumed by European
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 67 | view |
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
- task 1: Vietnamese student 61
- The percentage of tourists to England who visited Brighton attractions 61
- the proportion of women members of parliament in European nations from 2000 to 2012. 90
- task 1: relative price changes of three different groups 78
- Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies Do you agree or disagree 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 66, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'types'' or 'type's'?
Suggestion: types'; type's
...s the spending on fish and some various types meat in a European country from 1979 to...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 53, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'grams'.
Suggestion: grams
...consumption in 1979 was beef around 220 gram per person was consumed per week while ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 317, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'best the highest'.
Suggestion: best the highest
...ears. In the same time, chicken was the best highest spending, which was consumed by Europea...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 558.0 965.302439024 58% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 121.0 196.424390244 62% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.61157024793 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.31662479036 3.73543355544 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4418935415 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 66.0 106.607317073 62% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 156.6 283.868780488 55% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1870396863 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.0 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1666666667 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.5 5.23603664747 29% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204932150853 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110560151293 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107807822769 0.0843802449381 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17925129785 0.15604864568 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113267989517 0.0819641961636 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.11 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 19.0 40.7170731707 47% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.