In addition to the technological advances in today’s world, which provide a large amount of information for the users, the advances in various fields that are updated day by day guide us to choose to learn the most important information, instead of being overwhelmed by this large amount. Thus, it is important to choose the most appropriate academic subjects to study.
The advocates of the idea of concentrating on only one academic subject assert that we can make our base of knowledge and increase it by updating our information. Indeed, today the information is created at a very fast rate and in order to be an expert, one needs to study and gain information in only one specific subject since he does not have enough time to cover many fields simultaneously. For example, consider a student who is graduated and can get a good job position, taking advantage of his deep information in the field.
On the other hand, the endorsers of the idea of gaining knowledge in a broad range of subjects maintain that the universities are increasing the number of cross-disciplinary programs to satisfy the needs of the industry. In other words, as the jobs are becoming more professional, they need employees to have knowledge on different subjects to be able to solve the problems and tackle various issues. Employees also need to have different skills since they are more likely to work in a group rather than individually. In fact, in order to understand each other, group members have to have a common language. For example, industrial engineers are the ones who have to handle and manage a group of experts with different skills and academic background such as computer engineers, web developers, mechanical engineers and so forth.
To sum up, I am of the same opinion as of the advocates of the idea that it is essential to have knowledge in a broad range of academic fields.
- TPO-10 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- TPO-11 - Independent Writing Task Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with?Use specific reasons and examples to support you 68
- TPO-25 - Integrated Writing Task In 1938 an archaeologist in Iraq acquired a set of clay jars that had been excavated two years earlier by villagers constructing a railroad line. The vessel was about 2,200 years old. Each clay jay contained a copper cylin 80
- TPO-20 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they know how to do well. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- TPO-25 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 65
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, thus, for example, in addition, in fact, such as, in other words, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 43.0788530466 39% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1575.0 1977.66487455 80% => OK
No of words: 321.0 407.700716846 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90654205607 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97204425262 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 212.727598566 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523364485981 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.6003584229 53% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.1344086022 144% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.85402214 48.9658058833 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.181818182 100.406767564 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.1818181818 20.6045352989 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.81818181818 5.45110844103 180% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188960215785 0.236089414692 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0720937100315 0.076458572812 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0388591779905 0.0737576698707 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105103163297 0.150856017488 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0349989256361 0.0645574589148 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 11.7677419355 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 58.1214874552 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.1575268817 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.79 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 86.8835125448 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.0537634409 135% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.