The expansion of the runways at the Bay City Airport will allow larger planes to use the airport. These new planes will create a large amount of noise, a nuisance for residents who live near the airport. However, many of the residents in this neighborhood work in construction, and the contract to expand the runways has been awarded to a local construction company. Thus, the expansion of the runways will lead to an increased quality of life for the residents of this neighborhood.
This argument concludes that extending of runways at the Bay City Airport might allow bigger aircrafts to use the airport and this will incline quality of life for the local people. This conclusion, based solely on the one evidence, is doubtful. Are you sure that residents in that neighborhood work for that local company which has won the contract? If do not, how they can improve the quality of their life? Why are you confident that the company will fulfill her obligations?
First of all, it is assumed in the argument that "many of the residents" take part in that project. But how this data was obtained? Was there a statistic questioning? What is the sample? Is this sample conform with laws of statistic? Thus, this fact is untrustworthy and has the flaw as there is no possibility to understand his reliability.
Secondly, as for improving the quality of neighborhood life, in what condition is it now? Were made measurements of the current situation? These conclusions are not supported by anything and also have a fallacy.
Finally, people are not able to see the future, consequently, nobody could be certain that the local company will finish the project as there are a lot of factors which can influence on stages of the expansion of the runways at the Bay City Airport such as staff turnover, national currency devaluation or crisis.
To sum up, the argument and his conclusion are unwarranted because they do not support by statistics and risks were not determined and counted.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-11-10 | nicktyranov | 60 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The extended family (grandparents, cousins, aunts, and uncles) is less important now than it was in the past. 76
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- In the 1950s Torreya Taxifolia a type of evergreen tree once very common in the state of Florida started to die out No one is sure exactly what caused the decline but chances are good that if nothing is done Torreya will soon become extinct Experts are co 88
- Establishing good relationships in the workplace is not important as the primary goal of every person is to focus on work To what extent do you agree with this statement 86
flaws:
No. of Words: 254 350
---------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 16 15
No. of Words: 254 350
No. of Characters: 1207 1500
No. of Different Words: 147 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.992 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.752 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.681 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 80 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 69 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 43 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 31 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 15.875 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 12.129 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.5 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.268 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.523 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.038 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5