All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with these statements and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statements might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Foremost, it is totally depends on an individual company whether they want to hire or not to hire a consultants. As far as I'm concerned, it can be a bit of both. Any extreme ca go either way. Especially, the top priority should be the welfare of the employees of the company.
On the one hand, there are several employees who are introverts and reluctant to talking about themselves then the need of outside consultants is very much. They are professionals and their forte is to look after employees and requirements of those employees. As well as, those consultants can produce efficiency in those people by talking them about their problems. In return, companies try to look after to those problems like exhaustion from work, lack of incentives or maybe lack of appreciation and recognition and to tackle them for the betterment of their employees. The consultants can produce effective report on each individual and clearly understand the need. For instance, if someone is struggling with working hours and unhappy with the company policies of total hours then he/she can share this problem with consultant rather being afraid of losing job.
On other hand, the consultants definitely charges fees for those services in which return may causes a cost to the company. And eventually led to the pay cut of the employees. It can also hinder the socialness among people in a company. People may start behaving differentiate with colleagues and put their faith in consultants rather than sharing their issues with the senior or manager. Without consultants, manager get an opportunity to talk and know about the weaknesses and strongness of its subordinates which helps to use an individual in a specific ways. For example, if someone has good communication skills then that person can be use for presentations whereas if someone is not good in communication then that person can be put on a more desk work. So, this way a manager can enhance the performances of the employees. And increase an efficiency of the employees and the company.
In conclusion, it is difficult to choose or go either way. It can solely depends on the company needs or demands or maybe the company can hire outside consultants if they have the budget without compromising the pay checks of their employees. But the wellness of the employees should always be consider above all because they are ones who are giving their best to produce results for the company and putting their efforts to achieve the goals.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-10 | Bholuchand | 50 | view |
| 2021-10-25 | Saeed Najd Ataei | 33 | view |
- All too often companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees such consultants would be unnecessary Write a response in which you discuss 58
- All too often companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees such consultants would be unnecessary Write a response in which you discuss 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 99, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a consultant' or simply 'consultants'?
Suggestion: a consultant; consultants
...hether they want to hire or not to hire a consultants. As far as Im concerned, it can be a bi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 178, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[7]
Message: The proper name in singular (ca) must be used with a third-person verb: 'goes'.
Suggestion: goes
...it can be a bit of both. Any extreme ca go either way. Especially, the top priorit...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, may, so, then, well, whereas, for example, for instance, in conclusion, talking about, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.6327345309 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.9520958084 124% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 11.1786427146 188% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 13.6137724551 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 28.8173652695 111% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 55.5748502994 113% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 16.3942115768 49% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2073.0 2260.96107784 92% => OK
No of words: 418.0 441.139720559 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95933014354 5.12650576532 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52162009685 4.56307096286 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86581402811 2.78398813304 103% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 204.123752495 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488038277512 0.468620217663 104% => OK
syllable_count: 635.4 705.55239521 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.96107784431 161% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.76447105788 34% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.70958083832 148% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.67365269461 179% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.22255489022 118% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 19.7664670659 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.8473053892 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 57.1584899251 57.8364921388 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.7142857143 119.503703932 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9047619048 23.324526521 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.61904761905 5.70786347227 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.25449101796 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.20758483034 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.88822355289 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.67664670659 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255357768973 0.218282227539 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0697215449544 0.0743258471296 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0493377355559 0.0701772020484 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169922956522 0.128457276422 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0506848616164 0.0628817314937 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 14.3799401198 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.3550499002 125% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.197005988 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.5979740519 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.32208582834 94% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 98.500998004 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 12.3882235529 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.1389221557 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.9071856287 84% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.