Collectors prize the ancient life-size clay statues of human figures made on Kali Island but have long wondered how Kalinese artists were able to depict bodies with such realistic precision. Since archaeologists have recently discovered molds of human heads and hands on Kali, we can now conclude that the ancient Kalinese artists used molds of actual bodies, not sculpting tools and techniques, to create these statues. This discovery explains why Kalinese miniature statues were abstract and entirely different in style: molds could be used only for life-size sculptures. It also explains why few ancient Kalinese sculpting tools have been found. In light of this discovery, collectors predict that the life-size sculptures will decrease in value while the miniatures increase in value.
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the prediction and the argument on which it is based are reasonable. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the prediction.
For a long time it is wondered how Kalinese artists were able to made statues with such realistic precision. Recently archaeologists have discovered molds of human heads and hands on Kali. From this fact they concluded that molds of actual bodies were used to depict these structures, not the sclupting tools. But some assuptions made in this argument are not limpid. Some questions should be answered to make this conclusion valid.
Archaeologists have discovered only molds of human heads and hands. So question arises here that, “Have they found molds of other body parts?” Because it may be true that the Kalinese artists used molds made the heads and the hands only. For other body parts they used their sculpting tools and techniques with realistic precision. So it is not clear that they used molds for making other body parts or not.
Another conclusion is that explains why Kalinese miniature statues were abstract and entirely different in style ,molds could be used only for life-size sculptures. But question arises that How do the archaeologists know that the miniature statues are not made using molds from short humans and children? So this question needs to answered to make the assumptions true.
Archaelogists presumes that they found few amounts of sculpting tools. Question is, “Have they excavated all through the Kali Island in search of these tools?” May be they will find more sclupting tools, if they search more of the kali island. Kalinese artist might be lived away from these statues, so the sclupting tools may be found far from these statues.
Last question is, “Do antique buyers know the fact described in this argument?” Because they will buy life-sized statue rather than miniatures, because life-sized statues are more precisely made.
These argument made some assumptions which are being questioned to prove the truth of the argument.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-05 | Technoblade | 71 | view |
| 2023-02-25 | tedyang777 | 60 | view |
| 2022-10-19 | asingh1003 | 59 | view |
| 2022-06-19 | Pri_Judy | 50 | view |
| 2021-10-23 | amyabt | 58 | view |
- Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take 50
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and suppo 50
- Collectors prize the ancient life-size clay statues of human figures made on Kali Island but have long wondered how Kalinese artists were able to depict bodies with such realistic precision. Since archaeologists have recently discovered molds of human hea 63
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 20 15
No. of Words: 306 350
No. of Characters: 1527 1500
No. of Different Words: 146 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.182 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.99 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.481 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 90 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 73 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 58 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 36 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 15.3 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 4.22 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.4 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.32 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.581 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.079 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 6 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 114, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...abstract and entirely different in style ,molds could be used only for life-size s...
^^
Line 7, column 171, Rule ID: MAY_BE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'maybe' (=perhaps)?
Suggestion: Maybe
... Island in search of these tools?' May be they will find more sclupting tools, if...
^^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this argument' or 'These arguments'?
Suggestion: This argument; These arguments
...ized statues are more precisely made. These argument made some assumptions which are being q...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.6327345309 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.9520958084 62% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 11.1786427146 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 13.6137724551 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 28.8173652695 108% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 55.5748502994 47% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 16.3942115768 55% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1609.0 2260.96107784 71% => OK
No of words: 306.0 441.139720559 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25816993464 5.12650576532 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.56307096286 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6671812428 2.78398813304 96% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 204.123752495 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496732026144 0.468620217663 106% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 705.55239521 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.96107784431 20% => OK
Article: 0.0 8.76447105788 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.70958083832 148% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 19.7664670659 86% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.8473053892 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.9770515949 57.8364921388 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.6470588235 119.503703932 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 23.324526521 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.941176470588 5.70786347227 16% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 5.15768463074 116% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.20758483034 24% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 6.88822355289 44% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.67664670659 257% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288793450148 0.218282227539 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111717329771 0.0743258471296 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116185023361 0.0701772020484 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153206760028 0.128457276422 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118446099448 0.0628817314937 188% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.3799401198 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.3550499002 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.197005988 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 12.5979740519 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.32208582834 95% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 98.500998004 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 12.3882235529 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.1389221557 83% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.9071856287 109% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.