The following appeared in an article in a health–and–fitness magazine: “Laboratory studies show that Saluda Natural Spring Water contains several of the minerals necessary for good health and that it is completely free of bacteria. Residents of Saluda, the small town where the water is bottled, are hospitalized less frequently than the national average. Even though Saluda Natural Spring Water may seem expensive, drinking it instead of tap water is a wise investment in good health.”
Discuss how well reasoned . . . etc.
The topic brings upon a debate whether to drink tap or bottled water, both requires a certain experiment for deeper and further influences. According to the topic, studies show that Saluda Natural Spring contains minerals needs for good health and completely bacteria-free, even more, the residents of Saluda has a less hospitalized rate than the national average. An in depth research into the relations between the bottled water of Saluda and the nutritions of human health is needed.
People have been drinking water for centuries, while the dabate continues, we need scientific proof of the percentage of water quality effects our physical health. Maintaining health could come in different ways, from obtaining necessary nutrients to regular excercise, a minimum theory opposes that residents drinking water from the area are healthier seems debateful. A wide varitey of factors should be incuded as well, from the diets they're on to the average excercise duration and so on, a single factor of nutients in the water in the area couldn't be the right case.
However, we can't exile the fact that water is indeed the most important element in our body. Many diseases lead to the bacteria remains in the water, from the Dirty feet disease in Taiwan in the mid 1970, caused by the pollution caused by mercury to the Africans whom digestive systems are fulled with parasites. With the progress of modern infrastructure, most people around the world are able to access to clean water resouces with a tap of the faucet. On ther other hand, these pipes that carry water to our residences could be aging and decaing through time, bacteria are preserved in which could lead to our glasses of water. Rather than comparing these tap waters to bottled waters, people should be aware that through careful filteration and heating, bacteria could be eliminated and by obsorbing a wide variety of natural ingredients could also help us gain the nutrions we need.
In conclusion, water is the most important element in our body systems, but we couldn't rule out the other factors that are also affecting as a whole.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-19 | smnion | 29 | view |
| 2018-12-07 | nicktyranov | 51 | view |
- Colleges and universities should require all faculty to spend time working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the posit 50
- "Public figures such as actors, politicians, and athletes should expect people to be interestedin their private lives. When they seek a public role, they should expect that they will lose atleast some of their privacy 50
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company."According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than i 23
- The following appeared in an article in a health–and–fitness magazine: “Laboratory studies show that Saluda Natural Spring Water contains several of the minerals necessary for good health and that it is completely free of bacteria. Residents of Salu 29
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree 50
Comments
Essay evaluation report
out of topic.
---------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: ??? out of 6
Category: Poor Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 12 15
No. of Words: 357 350
No. of Characters: 1735 1500
No. of Different Words: 199 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.347 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.86 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.488 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 128 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 92 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 56 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 38 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 29.75 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.801 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.417 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.377 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.601 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.15 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 439, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: they're
...ould be incuded as well, from the diets theyre on to the average excercise duration an...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 547, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...or of nutients in the water in the area couldnt be the right case. How...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 13, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ight case. However, we cant exile the fact that water is indeed the...
^^^^
Line 13, column 80, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...ant element in our body systems, but we couldnt rule out the other factors that are als...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, well, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.6327345309 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.9520958084 69% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 11.1786427146 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 13.6137724551 59% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 28.8173652695 62% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 55.5748502994 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 16.3942115768 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1790.0 2260.96107784 79% => OK
No of words: 350.0 441.139720559 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11428571429 5.12650576532 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.56307096286 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69741524048 2.78398813304 97% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 204.123752495 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574285714286 0.468620217663 123% => OK
syllable_count: 547.2 705.55239521 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.96107784431 60% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.76447105788 68% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.22255489022 166% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 19.7664670659 46% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 38.0 22.8473053892 166% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 85.4297776749 57.8364921388 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 198.888888889 119.503703932 166% => OK
Words per sentence: 38.8888888889 23.324526521 167% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.70786347227 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.25449101796 76% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.20758483034 73% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 6.88822355289 15% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236371763342 0.218282227539 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10447304956 0.0743258471296 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114243985449 0.0701772020484 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143202780379 0.128457276422 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123596464355 0.0628817314937 197% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.1 14.3799401198 154% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.91 48.3550499002 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.1 12.197005988 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.95 12.5979740519 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.3 8.32208582834 124% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 98.500998004 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 12.3882235529 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.2 11.1389221557 154% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.9071856287 151% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.