The following appeared in a memo from the Mayor of the city of Hillview
“In order to alleviate the serious unemployment problem
in our town, we should encourage Autotech to build its automobile manufacturing
plant in our area. The Hillview landfill, which has been undeveloped for decades,
is a perfect site for this plant. The building and staffing of this plant
will put to work thousands of Hillview residents left unemployed after Computech
computer software programming company abandoned its national facility last
year. I am asking the City Council to authorize a large campaign to attract
the company and offer significant tax incentives to make our town attractive
to this giant of car manufacturing.”
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be
answered in order to decide whether the recommendation and the argument on
which it is based are reasonable. Be sure to explain how the answers to these
questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.
In above memoranda author recommended The city council to attract giant car manufacturing company to our town for building plant. The author's recommendation is potentially valid, but before its validity could be assessed, the following three question must be addressed. The area which has been undeveloped for decades, Will it be suitable for autotech plant. Why this area is not developed yet? Firstly compatibility of area with the requirenment for autotech should be checked. The people, Who lost their job from computer software programming company they must be a technical people. Will this technical people work as staffing and building of this plant.The autech plant company why should they hire people from same town only they may hire people from other towns as well. This giant company will really get attracted towards large campaing and significant tax incentives? After discussing above three question I am totally disagree with recomendation made by other that giant autotech company will get attracted to our town.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-12 | Technoblade | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-22 | keisham | 66 | view |
| 2022-08-30 | pallavi.singla2@gmail.com | 59 | view |
| 2021-10-13 | predatoros | 33 | view |
| 2021-10-11 | Ruffin_ | 57 | view |
- The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment 50
- Professors are normally found in university classrooms offices and libraries doing research and lecturing to their students More and more however they also appear as guests on television news programs giving expert commentary on the latest events in the w 85
- some people think that internet provides us valubale informarmation 61
- Many people are trying to reduce the amount of meat that they eat but they still crave meat products Scientists have recently developed methods to create simulated meats from vegetable protein that have the appearance taste and texture of real meat to sat 81
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to 50
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 135, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...any to our town for building plant. The authors recommendation is potentially valid, bu...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 658, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
... as staffing and building of this plant.The autech plant company why should they hi...
^^^
Line 1, column 878, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ampaing and significant tax incentives? After discussing above three question I am to...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 929, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'disagreed'.
Suggestion: disagreed
...ssing above three question I am totally disagree with recomendation made by other that g...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, really, so, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.6327345309 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.9520958084 77% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 11.1786427146 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 13.6137724551 22% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 28.8173652695 49% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 55.5748502994 29% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 16.3942115768 30% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 868.0 2260.96107784 38% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 162.0 441.139720559 37% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35802469136 5.12650576532 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 4.56307096286 78% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78358788801 2.78398813304 100% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 204.123752495 52% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.654320987654 0.468620217663 140% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 705.55239521 38% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.96107784431 20% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.76447105788 57% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 19.7664670659 46% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 22.8473053892 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.4711957583 57.8364921388 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.4444444444 119.503703932 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 23.324526521 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11111111111 5.70786347227 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 5.15768463074 19% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.25449101796 76% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.20758483034 37% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 6.88822355289 29% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.67664670659 86% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186394344669 0.218282227539 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.077521824772 0.0743258471296 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0540339798202 0.0701772020484 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186394344669 0.128457276422 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0628817314937 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 14.3799401198 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.3550499002 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.197005988 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.51 12.5979740519 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.32208582834 100% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 98.500998004 40% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 12.3882235529 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.1389221557 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 135, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...any to our town for building plant. The authors recommendation is potentially valid, bu...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 658, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
... as staffing and building of this plant.The autech plant company why should they hi...
^^^
Line 1, column 878, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ampaing and significant tax incentives? After discussing above three question I am to...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 929, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'disagreed'.
Suggestion: disagreed
...ssing above three question I am totally disagree with recomendation made by other that g...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, really, so, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.6327345309 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.9520958084 77% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 11.1786427146 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 13.6137724551 22% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 28.8173652695 49% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 55.5748502994 29% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 16.3942115768 30% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 868.0 2260.96107784 38% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 162.0 441.139720559 37% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35802469136 5.12650576532 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 4.56307096286 78% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78358788801 2.78398813304 100% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 204.123752495 52% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.654320987654 0.468620217663 140% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 705.55239521 38% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.96107784431 20% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.76447105788 57% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 19.7664670659 46% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 22.8473053892 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.4711957583 57.8364921388 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.4444444444 119.503703932 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 23.324526521 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11111111111 5.70786347227 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 5.15768463074 19% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.25449101796 76% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.20758483034 37% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 6.88822355289 29% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.67664670659 86% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186394344669 0.218282227539 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.077521824772 0.0743258471296 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0540339798202 0.0701772020484 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186394344669 0.128457276422 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0628817314937 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 14.3799401198 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.3550499002 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.197005988 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.51 12.5979740519 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.32208582834 100% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 98.500998004 40% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 12.3882235529 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.1389221557 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.