The following appeared in a memo from the Mayor of the city of Hillview: " In order to alleviate the serious unemployment problem in our town, we should encourage Autotech to build its automobile manufacturing plant in our area. The Hillview landfill, which has been undeveloped for decades, is a perfect site for the plant. The building and staffing of this plant will put to work thousands of Hillview residents left unemployed after Computech computer software programming company abandoned its national facility last year. I am asking City Council to authorize a large campaign to attract the company and offer a significant tax incentives to make our town attractive to this giant of car manufacturing." Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the recommendation and the argument on which it is based on are reasonable. Be sure to explain how the answer to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.
Mayor of the city of the Hillview asserts in a memo that there is increased unemployment
problem in the city of Hillview. The main reason he quotes to the abondonment of the
national facility last year by the computech computer software programming company in
the city. Mayor recommends a few measures to mitigate the unemployment problem. He avers
that the Hillview landfill has been undeveloped for the decades and is the perfect site
for the Autotech plant in the city. According to the Mayor, if the city can attract the
giant car manufacturing companies to build the automobile plant site in the city, there
will be reduced unemployment owing to the increased workforce demands. Building and
staffing of the plants will put to work thousands of the Hillview residents, the Mayor
concludes. Mayor recommends the large campaign to attract the giant car manufacturing
company through significant tax incentives.
This opinion has a few assumptions. Solving these assumptions can give the lucid answer
for the right decision making. These assumptions has to be properly analysed and
validated. The argument might prove defunct, if these assumptions are validated.
Firstly, There is an underlying assumption that the workers working at computech
computer software programming company will need not upskilling or will have similar
skills to work in the autotech company. This needs to be solved, as there might be huge
skill gap to even provide right employment opportunity to the right candidate. There
might be need of initial money and time investments for upskilling which can be used for
building some other industry other than Autotech in alignment with current workforce
skills.
Secondly, The residents might not be willing to work in the extreme manufacturing
conditions. It is important to note the residents population demographics such as the
ratio of women to men, young to old, Graduated to primary educated. These are important
factors to consider before setting the workers expectations for the AutoTech. For
example, there can be residents older than forties and not willing to work in the
construction sites. There can be younger generation who was willing to work in the
computech company with good in-house facilities and not be willing to work in the rash
construction sites.
Lastly, it is important to find out the reason behind Computech company to leave the
city. The city might not be having conducive environment to attract the skillful
resources or may be business and clients within the company. The city might need major
upgrade to attract the cosmopolitan opportunities. In such case, the major investments
would be required to build great universities and upgrading bucolic settings in the city
to attract further urban developments. Infact, city might be the best to provide bucolic
settings and attract tourism. Building tourism space and industry might be beneficial
for the city, in that case.
Therefore, the argument mentioned in the memo is presumptuous to take to the decision of
inviting AutoTech. The above-mentioned assumptions should be properly validated to reach
to the conclusion. According to the assumptons, the argument needs a proper check on the
demographics of the current workforce, checking the city's current ambience and settings
or may be upskilling the current workforce to attract right fit opportunities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-12 | Technoblade | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-22 | keisham | 66 | view |
| 2022-08-30 | pallavi.singla2@gmail.com | 59 | view |
| 2021-10-13 | predatoros | 33 | view |
| 2021-10-11 | Ruffin_ | 57 | view |
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered to decide whether the recommendation is likely to have the 50
- The following appeared in a memo from the Mayor of the city of Hillview In order to alleviate the serious unemployment problem in our town we should encourage Autotech to build its automobile manufacturing plant in our area The Hillview landfill which has 59
- Some people believe that increasing violence in the media is the cause of increasing violence in our society especially among children Others believe that children s peer groups and parental role models are a much more powerful influence on children s beh 50
- An international development organization in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A While seeds for this new type of millet cost more farmers will be paid 50
Comments
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 2 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 12 2
No. of Sentences: 28 15
No. of Words: 534 350
No. of Characters: 2782 1500
No. of Different Words: 232 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.807 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.21 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.914 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 201 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 183 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 128 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 82 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.071 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.865 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.357 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.292 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.292 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.129 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 1 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 50, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'have', 'haven'.
Suggestion: have; haven
...ight decision making. These assumptions has to be properly analysed and validated....
^^^
Line 23, column 41, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'residents'' or 'resident's'?
Suggestion: residents'; resident's
...conditions. It is important to note the residents population demographics such as the ra...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, lastly, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, as to, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.6327345309 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 24.0 12.9520958084 185% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 11.1786427146 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 13.6137724551 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 28.8173652695 49% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 55.5748502994 128% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 16.3942115768 98% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2908.0 2260.96107784 129% => OK
No of words: 534.0 441.139720559 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4456928839 5.12650576532 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80712388197 4.56307096286 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9857423265 2.78398813304 107% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 204.123752495 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.440074906367 0.468620217663 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 871.2 705.55239521 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.96107784431 161% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.76447105788 126% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.22255489022 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 19.7664670659 142% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.8473053892 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.7338670323 57.8364921388 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.857142857 119.503703932 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0714285714 23.324526521 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.85714285714 5.70786347227 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 40.0 5.15768463074 776% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.25449101796 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 8.20758483034 207% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.88822355289 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.67664670659 150% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14276733885 0.218282227539 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0480031377664 0.0743258471296 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0724297993964 0.0701772020484 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.040496522165 0.128457276422 32% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0576532731677 0.0628817314937 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.3799401198 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.3550499002 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.197005988 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.5979740519 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.32208582834 101% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 98.500998004 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 12.3882235529 93% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.1389221557 86% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.9071856287 118% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.