People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered to decide whether the recommendation is likely to have the predicted result. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.
Author opined that the decision maker who take emotional decisions and rationalise their decisions afterwards with logic are poor decision makers. Flipping the coin might vary the resulting postulation by author. A few arguments have to be analysed to correctly insinuating the recommended prediction.
First of all, Let' s analyse; Are all of the decisions taken in emotions and are rationalised afterwards, results in negative consequences? Author has assumed negative effect of the results of emotional decisions. Is it veritable to say all of the situations creating chaotic results. Author might have gainsaid to the positive effects. There might be ephemeral negative consequences but producing intransigent positive impact. We might encapsulate the predicted recommendation, only when we know the probability of favouring or un-favouring denouement of any given situation.
Secondly, As per author; Poor decision makers are generally defined as the ones, who can-not take decisions effectively? Or the ones who take longer time to take the decisions? It is important to know the measure of time duration referred by the author. The author might be comparing the decisions taken in minute to the decisions taken in hours and hence publishing the people taking decisions in hours as poor decision makers. While the result produced by the later people might be more efficient that the former ones or vice-versa.
Lastly, Are the situations pertaining to the decision making are logical or purely driven by the emotional motives of the involved people. For example; a judge has to exculpate a mother guilty of theft to feed her child, while there is no negative effect on the victim other than a minute loss of food.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-30 | yixova3193 | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-09 | Truss | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-04 | Adesina Boluwatito | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-01 | shamika@25 | 50 | view |
| 2023-09-14 | RIYA MODI | 58 | view |
- The following appeared in a memo from the Mayor of the city of Hillview In order to alleviate the serious unemployment problem in our town we should encourage Autotech to build its automobile manufacturing plant in our area The Hillview landfill which has 59
- An international development organization in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A While seeds for this new type of millet cost more farmers will be paid 50
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered to decide whether the recommendation is likely to have the 50
- Some people believe that increasing violence in the media is the cause of increasing violence in our society especially among children Others believe that children s peer groups and parental role models are a much more powerful influence on children s beh 50
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 34, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...on. First of all, Let s analyse; Are all of the decisions taken in emotions and are rat...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 237, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ional decisions. Is it veritable to say all of the situations creating chaotic results. Au...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, lastly, second, secondly, while, as to, for example, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 33.0505617978 24% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 58.6224719101 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1455.0 2235.4752809 65% => OK
No of words: 273.0 442.535393258 62% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32967032967 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.55969084622 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95739854852 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 215.323595506 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545787545788 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 704.065955056 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.2531845842 60.3974514979 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.9375 118.986275619 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0625 23.4991977007 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.21951772744 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308219771658 0.243740707755 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0973292651003 0.0831039109588 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118112493399 0.0758088955206 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199910749092 0.150359130593 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121284241509 0.0667264976115 182% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 48.8420337079 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 100.480337079 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 34, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...on. First of all, Let s analyse; Are all of the decisions taken in emotions and are rat...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 237, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ional decisions. Is it veritable to say all of the situations creating chaotic results. Au...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, lastly, second, secondly, while, as to, for example, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 33.0505617978 24% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 58.6224719101 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1455.0 2235.4752809 65% => OK
No of words: 273.0 442.535393258 62% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32967032967 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.55969084622 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95739854852 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 215.323595506 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545787545788 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 704.065955056 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.2531845842 60.3974514979 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.9375 118.986275619 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0625 23.4991977007 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.21951772744 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308219771658 0.243740707755 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0973292651003 0.0831039109588 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118112493399 0.0758088955206 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199910749092 0.150359130593 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121284241509 0.0667264976115 182% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 48.8420337079 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 100.480337079 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.