The following appeared in a memo from the vice president of a food distribution company with food storage warehouses in several cities.
"Recently, we signed a contract with the Fly-Away Pest Control Company to provide pest control services at our warehouse in Palm City, but last month we discovered that over $20,000 worth of food there had been destroyed by pest damage. Meanwhile, the Buzzoff Pest Control Company, which we have used for many years in Palm City, continued to service our warehouse in Wintervale, and last month only $10,000 worth of the food stored there had been destroyed by pest damage. Even though the price charged by Fly-Away is considerably lower, our best means of saving money is to return to Buzzoff for all our pest control services."
Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are for the argument if the assumptions prove unwarranted.
In this memo, the vice president of a food distribution company with food storage warehouse concludes that in order to save money from the pest controlling, it should return to Buzzoff Pest control for all their pest control services. However, the author’s argument is problematic in several critical aspects.
Firstly, the argument depends upon the hasty assumption that returning to buzzoff pest control for all their pest control services is unwarranted. If according to the elucidation, Fly away pest control company destroyed over 20000 dollar worth of food in pest controlling. Vice president ignores circumstances of warehouses. Moreover, ignoring the situation of warehouse such as any internal damage to particular department, Cold Room storage failure. In other words, there may be possibility of any technical failure in operating warehouse at specific temperature for food storage system.
Secondly, its depends upon the use of chemical compound in pest control devices. Similarly, use of chemical compound to preserve the food may cause the same damage like pest controlling. It is also dependent on site, texture of soil and weather of that site for storage of food in warehouse, plays vital role. In addition to this, skilled worker play an important role in managing different operations of warehouse like collecting and dispatching operation may lead to certain obstacle to pest controlling, unexpected contact of chemical to the air.
Thirdly, in comparison to buzzoff pest control company at Winterville, buzzoff uses different devices, tact’s and principle. Instead, manager of warehouse at wintervale, is organises operation in correct way. Though, buzzoff charges mort than that of fly away pest controlling, they are not utilizing the full sources of pest control, and leads to some area as untouched by pest control. Therefore, less damage to food. But latter may cost more for repairing of untouched area because less volume more cost.
In summary, there is no availability of discipline that maintained at Palm City for pest controlling services. The argument remains deficient. To bolster, this argument vice president of food company should support with more modern plan and operations of warehouse at palm city.
- The expression never, never give up means to keep trying and never stop working for your goals. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
- People should undertake risky action only after they have carefully considered its consequences. 50
- The following appeared in a memo from the vice president of a food distribution company with food storage warehouses in several cities."Recently, we signed a contract with the Fly-Away Pest Control Company to provide pest control services at our ware 63
- The following appeared in a memorandum from the owner of Movies Galore, a chain of movie-rental stores."In order to stop the recent decline in our profits, we must reduce operating expenses at Movies Galore's ten movie-rental stores. Since we ar 50
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 19 15
No. of Words: 348 350
No. of Characters: 1845 1500
No. of Different Words: 184 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.319 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.302 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.777 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 146 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 132 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 83 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 60 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 18.316 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.314 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.684 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.325 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.325 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.06 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 1 5
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, similarly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, in addition, in summary, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 19.6327345309 36% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.9520958084 46% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 11.1786427146 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 13.6137724551 37% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 28.8173652695 49% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 55.5748502994 108% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 16.3942115768 73% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1909.0 2260.96107784 84% => OK
No of words: 348.0 441.139720559 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48563218391 5.12650576532 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.56307096286 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93431611424 2.78398813304 105% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 204.123752495 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540229885057 0.468620217663 115% => OK
syllable_count: 603.9 705.55239521 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.96107784431 101% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.76447105788 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.22255489022 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 19.7664670659 96% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.8473053892 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 55.4321226511 57.8364921388 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.473684211 119.503703932 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3157894737 23.324526521 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.57894736842 5.70786347227 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.25449101796 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.20758483034 37% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 6.88822355289 174% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.67664670659 86% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.410645883063 0.218282227539 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12331167761 0.0743258471296 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109036134554 0.0701772020484 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.263520270933 0.128457276422 205% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.098209351083 0.0628817314937 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 14.3799401198 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.3550499002 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.197005988 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.5979740519 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.32208582834 108% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 98.500998004 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 12.3882235529 69% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.1389221557 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.