The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station.“Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this time period, most of the co

The memorandum is discussing the problem that is faced by the television stations' overall progression and economic growth. The memorandum is illuminating the problem, the cause of the problem, and giving the solution. It is highlighting the cause of the problem: changing in the timings of the programs. As a result there is a downfall in viewers of the station, and most of the viewers are complaining about the whether and local news. It also affects their advertising contracts ,that is, many of the advertising contracts are cancelled. The memorandum also proposed the solution that reversing the timings can solve the problem. However, on scrutiny the author has presented flawed conclusion.

Many points given in support of the view of the writer are not convincing. Assumption that the viewers are complaining, due to change in timing is not persuasive. There can be many other more weighted reasons as well; such as, there is a possibility that when this change is happened, in that time period, the type of viewers might have changed; therefore, the new population might have new taste, as an example: the new viewers might like some entertaining programs rather than the news, or they might be interested in comedy news etc.

Nevertheless, another reason for the downfall of the television station could be that by the passage of time many other stations could be more active than this station. The quality of other stations' news might be more good, authentic, and flimsy than the station mentioned in the memorandum. In addition, there could be more content on the other channels than on this channel. Furthermore, the author mentioned that there are complains about the weather and local news, and the assumption (for this complain) given is: It is because of change in timings. Nonetheless this assumption is again not convincing, as there is a possibility that the complains could be because of the quality or the content of the news. The news regarding local and whether could be of some other location and not of the local area, due to this reason there could be complains.

Moreover, there is another problem mentioned, that the television station also lose its' advertising contracts, The authors' assumption of timings is not credible. The reduction in profit due to lose of advertising could be because this station might be charging more than another station. Eventually the advertising contracts prefers other channels.

The argument is flawed and the conclusion cannot be accepted based on the evidence and reasoning provided.

Votes
Average: 5 (3 votes)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 481, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...also affects their advertising contracts ,that is, many of the advertising contrac...
^^
Line 3, column 537, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... might be interested in comedy news etc. Nevertheless, another reason for the dow...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 554, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Nonetheless,
...is: It is because of change in timings. Nonetheless this assumption is again not convincing...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 116, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...lso lose its advertising contracts, The authors assumption of timings is not credible. ...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 23, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ther channels. The argument is flawed and the conclusion cannot be accepted ba...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, moreover, nevertheless, nonetheless, regarding, so, then, therefore, well, in addition, such as, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 33.0 19.6327345309 168% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.9520958084 124% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 11.1786427146 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 13.6137724551 81% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 28.8173652695 80% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 55.5748502994 76% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 16.3942115768 116% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2141.0 2260.96107784 95% => OK
No of words: 417.0 441.139720559 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13429256595 5.12650576532 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 4.56307096286 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79780792471 2.78398813304 100% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 204.123752495 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.407673860911 0.468620217663 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 652.5 705.55239521 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.96107784431 81% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.76447105788 137% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.67365269461 299% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 19.7664670659 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.8473053892 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.8333312236 57.8364921388 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.05 119.503703932 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.85 23.324526521 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 5.70786347227 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.25449101796 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.20758483034 73% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 6.88822355289 160% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.67664670659 64% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223907745203 0.218282227539 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0733706196239 0.0743258471296 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0528323673801 0.0701772020484 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114170982474 0.128457276422 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0643701689845 0.0628817314937 102% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 14.3799401198 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.3550499002 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.197005988 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.5979740519 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.32208582834 101% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 98.500998004 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 12.3882235529 69% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.1389221557 90% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

flaws:
not well organized.

----------------------
samples:
https://www.testbig.com/gmatgre-argument-task-essays/over-past-year-our…

----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 20 15
No. of Words: 417 350
No. of Characters: 2077 1500
No. of Different Words: 154 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.519 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.981 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.69 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 149 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 127 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 81 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 54 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20.85 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 11.804 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.55 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.329 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.549 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.111 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5