"An innovative treatment has come to our attention that promises to significantly reduce absenteeism in our schools and workplaces. A study reports that in nearby East Meria, where fish consumption is very high, people visit the doctor only once or twice per year for the treatment of colds. Clearly, eating a substantial amount of fish can prevent colds. Since colds represent the most frequently given reason for absences from school and work, we recommend the daily use of Ichthaid—a nutritional supplement derived from fish oil—as a good way to prevent colds and lower absenteeism."
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
The author claims that daily use of nutritional supplement that is derived from fish oil can prevent colds and ultimatly reduce absenteeism in schools and workplaces. The statement is based on evidence that ought to be examined in order to give comprehensive estimastion of the reliability of recommendation.
Firstly, the author cites that people living in East Meria consume a substantial amount of fish and thus they visit the doctor only once or twice per year for the treatment of colds. To support this assumption we need evidence that all the people of East Meria visit doctor for sure if they have cold. It is possible that people might have taken cold medicine available in market instade of visiting doctor. If this is true than lack of such evidence undermine the argument.
Secondly, the author states that most frequently given reason for absences from school and work is cold. Howerver, It is possible that information provide by students and workers is not valid. Without any evidence about such possiblity the author's argument that nutritional supplement will help to reduce absenteeism falls apart.
In conclusion, the given evidence has failed to create a sound support for recommendation. In order to bolster the recommendation , the author should provide evidence showing that proportion of people had cold and eat fish in a significant amount and reliability of the reason provided by students and workers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-27 | ginagirl816 | 70 | view |
| 2019-10-18 | sakshee | 72 | view |
| 2019-10-07 | 08sandip | 39 | view |
| 2019-09-17 | arvind158 | 50 | view |
| 2019-09-11 | raolitesh@gmail.com | 59 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 409, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e in market instade of visiting doctor. If this is true than lack of such evidence...
^^
Line 7, column 130, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
.... In order to bolster the recommendation , the author should provide evidence show...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['first', 'firstly', 'if', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'thus', 'in conclusion']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.282868525896 0.25644967241 110% => OK
Verbs: 0.167330677291 0.15541462614 108% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0836653386454 0.0836205057962 100% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0398406374502 0.0520304965353 77% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0199203187251 0.0272364105082 73% => OK
Prepositions: 0.159362549801 0.125424944231 127% => OK
Participles: 0.0517928286853 0.0416121511921 124% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.91136592951 2.79052419416 104% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0239043824701 0.026700313972 90% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.001811407834 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0796812749004 0.113004496875 71% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0199203187251 0.0255425247493 78% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00796812749004 0.0127820249294 62% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1439.0 2731.13054187 53% => OK
No of words: 232.0 446.07635468 52% => More words wanted.
Chars per words: 6.2025862069 6.12365571057 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 4.57801047555 85% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.387931034483 0.378187486979 103% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.271551724138 0.287650121315 94% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.211206896552 0.208842608468 101% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.133620689655 0.135150697306 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91136592951 2.79052419416 104% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 207.018472906 63% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564655172414 0.469332199767 120% => OK
Word variations: 54.5851173491 52.1807786196 105% => OK
How many sentences: 11.0 20.039408867 55% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0909090909 23.2022227129 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8664389119 57.7814097925 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.818181818 141.986410481 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0909090909 23.2022227129 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.727272727273 0.724660767414 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.14285714286 78% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.58251231527 56% => OK
Readability: 48.2460815047 51.9672348444 93% => OK
Elegance: 2.17543859649 1.8405768891 118% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.359222931709 0.441005458295 81% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.123066947966 0.135418324435 91% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0823695581686 0.0829849096947 99% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.61671575872 0.58762219726 105% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.126936986182 0.147661913831 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.16227755553 0.193483328276 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0689391349656 0.0970749176394 71% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.292771840217 0.42659136922 69% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0448102087913 0.0774707102158 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.247509610132 0.312017818177 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0451576396885 0.0698173142475 65% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.33743842365 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 6.87684729064 15% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.82512315271 62% => OK
Positive topic words: 7.0 6.46551724138 108% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 5.36822660099 19% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.82389162562 106% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 14.657635468 75% => OK
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 41.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.5 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations to cover all aspects.