An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be paid subsidies for farming the new variety of millet. Since millet is already a staple food in Tagus, people will readily adopt the new variety. To combat vitamin A deficiency, the government of Tagus should do everything it can to promote this new type of millet.
__________
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered to decide whether the recommendation is likely to have the predicted result. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.
The argument posits that a new type of millet is engineered by an international development organization to counter the deficiency of vitamin A among the people of Tagus. Although, more information and thought are required to validate the recommendation given by the author to combat the problem given in the argument. There may be some hidden factors that are necessary to evaluate the soundness of the proposed plan given by author.
The argument says that subsidies will be provided to farmers for farming the new kind of millet but it doesn't express clearly what kind of items will be covered in these subsidies. Yes, the price of the seed is one of the things which can help farmers but other important factors remain untouched in the argument which should be covered in subsidies, such as, Whether farmers are equipped with the kind of resources such as land to grow this new kind of millet? Environment factors and local conditions are not taken into account while proposing the new millet as a solution. Is there enough water available for irrigation purposes? So there is ambiguity as to what will be covered in subsidies and what will not and up to what extent it can affect the production of millets.
The presumption is that the new kind of millet will not be able to replace old millet as it is already a staple food among the population of millet. It's a bold statement without any proof and to know this a serious scrutiny is required. For example, Does the taste and shape of the new millet are same as the old millet? Are both the millets still in the market and people are allowed to eat whatever they can? Is there any other source of vitamin A that people can take to avoid the new engineered millets?
These are the question that needs to be answered before reaching any conclusion.
Likewise, the author is optimistic about the fact that new millets will be enough to deal with the problem of deficiency of Vitamin A. We don't know if there might be some other factors involved such as infection and disease among the people of Tagus. The author also assumes that if govt promote the new engineered millets then people will buy it. It is assumed that lack of knowledge about new millets is the reason behind the inadaptability. This might be true but it can be false as well.
Examining all the various angles and factors involved with the adaptability of the new kind of millets it can be said that more information with facts will be required to reach a conclusion and to make a plan to fight the deficiency of vitamin A in people of Tagus.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-20 | Dinesh4518 | 63 | view |
| 2023-08-11 | Nowshin Tabassum | 69 | view |
| 2023-07-21 | Gnyana | 68 | view |
| 2023-07-20 | Prasad002 | 59 | view |
| 2023-07-08 | tanvik21 | 74 | view |
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree wi 50
- An international development organization in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A While seeds for this new type of millet cost more farmers will be paid 58
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered to decide whether the recommendation is likely to have the 58
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree wi 16
- According to a recent report by our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any other year And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies actual 54
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 104, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...r farming the new kind of millet but it doesnt express clearly what kind of items will...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 149, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: It's; It is
...le food among the population of millet. Its a bold statement without any proof and ...
^^^
Line 5, column 139, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... problem of deficiency of Vitamin A. We dont know if there might be some other facto...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, likewise, may, so, still, then, well, while, as to, for example, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 32.0 19.6327345309 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.9520958084 139% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 11.1786427146 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 13.6137724551 88% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 28.8173652695 87% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 55.5748502994 115% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 16.3942115768 110% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2112.0 2260.96107784 93% => OK
No of words: 456.0 441.139720559 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63157894737 5.12650576532 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62105577807 4.56307096286 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56943810153 2.78398813304 92% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 204.123752495 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.434210526316 0.468620217663 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 678.6 705.55239521 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.96107784431 101% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.76447105788 68% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.22255489022 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 19.7664670659 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.8473053892 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.2814473508 57.8364921388 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.6 119.503703932 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8 23.324526521 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 5.70786347227 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 5.15768463074 116% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.20758483034 85% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.88822355289 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.67664670659 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.456758653562 0.218282227539 209% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146943300081 0.0743258471296 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116123348412 0.0701772020484 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230782049189 0.128457276422 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0980516297462 0.0628817314937 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 14.3799401198 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.3550499002 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.197005988 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.87 12.5979740519 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.32208582834 92% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 98.500998004 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 12.3882235529 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.1389221557 97% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.9071856287 92% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 104, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...r farming the new kind of millet but it doesnt express clearly what kind of items will...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 149, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: It's; It is
...le food among the population of millet. Its a bold statement without any proof and ...
^^^
Line 5, column 139, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... problem of deficiency of Vitamin A. We dont know if there might be some other facto...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, likewise, may, so, still, then, well, while, as to, for example, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 32.0 19.6327345309 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.9520958084 139% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 11.1786427146 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 13.6137724551 88% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 28.8173652695 87% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 55.5748502994 115% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 16.3942115768 110% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2112.0 2260.96107784 93% => OK
No of words: 456.0 441.139720559 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63157894737 5.12650576532 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62105577807 4.56307096286 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56943810153 2.78398813304 92% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 204.123752495 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.434210526316 0.468620217663 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 678.6 705.55239521 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.96107784431 101% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.76447105788 68% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.22255489022 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 19.7664670659 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.8473053892 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.2814473508 57.8364921388 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.6 119.503703932 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8 23.324526521 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 5.70786347227 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 5.15768463074 116% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.20758483034 85% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.88822355289 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.67664670659 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.456758653562 0.218282227539 209% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146943300081 0.0743258471296 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116123348412 0.0701772020484 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230782049189 0.128457276422 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0980516297462 0.0628817314937 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 14.3799401198 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.3550499002 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.197005988 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.87 12.5979740519 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.32208582834 92% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 98.500998004 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 12.3882235529 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.1389221557 97% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.9071856287 92% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.