An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be paid subsidies for farming the new variety of millet. Since millet is already a staple food in Tagus, people will readily adopt the new variety. To combat vitamin A deficiency, the government of Tagus should do everything it can to promote this new type of millet.
The claim that people of the impoverished nation - Tagus have a deficiency of vitamin A is based on a survey. But there is no information given about the type of survey conducted, parameters taken into consideration and the sample size of the population.
This survey may not be an exact analysis of the people of Tagus as the deficiency of vitamins need a proper examination of body fluids whereas in the above statements,no information is provided.
Also, it is being stated that the cost of new millet seeds is more than the current breed. We do not know the difference in their cost. Though the government will provide subsidy to farmers, we do not know whether or not the amount of subsidy will be sufficient. Moreover, the cost of harvesting and cultivating the new breed of millet is not being considered. The new breed of millet might have completely different cultivation methods and may need proper storage which might be lacking in the impoverished country.
The current breed of millet is a staple food in Tagus whereas the people may not like the taste and flavor of the new millet.
Even if there is a deficiency of vitamin A, millets is not the only available alternative. Additional health suppliments, Fruits and vegetables like carrots and apples can also serve the purpose.
- An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be p 60
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 58, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Tagus) must be used with a third-person verb: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...ople of the impoverished nation - Tagus have a deficiency of vitamin A is based on a...
^^^^
Line 3, column 167, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , no
...y fluids whereas in the above statements,no information is provided. Also, it is...
^^^
Line 5, column 207, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...vide subsidy to farmers, we do not know whether or not the amount of subsidy will be sufficien...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'so', 'whereas']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.278008298755 0.25644967241 108% => OK
Verbs: 0.149377593361 0.15541462614 96% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0788381742739 0.0836205057962 94% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0497925311203 0.0520304965353 96% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0165975103734 0.0272364105082 61% => OK
Prepositions: 0.132780082988 0.125424944231 106% => OK
Participles: 0.0497925311203 0.0416121511921 120% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.84800481068 2.79052419416 102% => OK
Infinitives: 0.00414937759336 0.026700313972 16% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.001811407834 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.132780082988 0.113004496875 117% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0331950207469 0.0255425247493 130% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00414937759336 0.0127820249294 32% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1304.0 2731.13054187 48% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 222.0 446.07635468 50% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.87387387387 6.12365571057 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 4.57801047555 84% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.333333333333 0.378187486979 88% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.22972972973 0.287650121315 80% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.153153153153 0.208842608468 73% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.130630630631 0.135150697306 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84800481068 2.79052419416 102% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 207.018472906 58% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540540540541 0.469332199767 115% => OK
Word variations: 50.1001382863 52.1807786196 96% => OK
How many sentences: 11.0 20.039408867 55% => OK
Sentence length: 20.1818181818 23.2022227129 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7306679743 57.7814097925 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.545454545 141.986410481 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1818181818 23.2022227129 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.636363636364 0.724660767414 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.14285714286 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 3.58251231527 84% => OK
Readability: 43.1547911548 51.9672348444 83% => OK
Elegance: 2.13461538462 1.8405768891 116% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.422106877263 0.441005458295 96% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.164130394048 0.135418324435 121% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0803910535079 0.0829849096947 97% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.70089185825 0.58762219726 119% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.169788292832 0.147661913831 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.206021964706 0.193483328276 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0939827783013 0.0970749176394 97% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.437486932575 0.42659136922 103% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.106374808961 0.0774707102158 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.272276020111 0.312017818177 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0919326341193 0.0698173142475 132% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.33743842365 36% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 6.87684729064 29% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.82512315271 124% => OK
Positive topic words: 2.0 6.46551724138 31% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 5.36822660099 37% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 2.82389162562 177% => OK
Total topic words: 9.0 14.657635468 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
More content wanted. For issue essays, around 450 words, for argument essays, around 400 words.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 41.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.5 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.