"In a laboratory study of liquid antibacterial hand soaps, a concentrated solution of UltraClean produced a 40 percent greater reduction in the bacteria population than did the liquid hand soaps currently used in our hospitals. During a subsequent test of UltraClean at our hospital in Work by, that hospital reported significantly fewer cases of patient infection than did any of the other hospitals in our group. Therefore, to prevent serious patient infections, we should supply UltraClean at all hand-washing stations throughout our hospital system."
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
The author of the argument purportedly highlights that the widespread use of ultraclean soap in hand-washing stations could diminish patient infection. However, the premises upon which he puts his claim are fallacious. For the support of which more well-established evidence should be given.
First, the author contends that based on a study, use of ultraclean soap decrease bacteria population by 40 percent than liquid hand soap in the hospital. However, it does not lend credence to the argument since there is no sufficient evidence to support if this study is reliable and accurate. One point that should be considered is that different studies in the laboratory need several years for reliable outcomes. Indeed, there is no evidence to support to the extent people have been satisfied with this new soap. Maybe majorities of people still prefer to use liquid soap. It is also important to say that this new substance might not be healthy and there is a possibility that this ultraclean soap creates some problem for people's skin.
The author also asserts that this hospital where new soap is produced reported fewer patient infection than any other hospital. Although it might seem tenable at the face, it has some defects due to the paucity of evidence, which could consolidate the premise the otherwise. One of the main, if not the only, problem with the premise is that maybe this hospital just wants to advertise its new finding and make it profitable for the hospital. Or perhaps this hospital is not reliable or do not have enough facilities and people prefer to be treated in the other hospital.
Finally, as set forth by the author this ultraclean soap will reduce patient infection. Nevertheless, the rationale behind this premise could be challenged owing to an inadequate evidence to support if the only reason of infection is soap. One point that should not go unnoticed is that various factors could have an impact on infection and perhaps worsened the infections and convey by different ways. Moreover, what if people be sensitive to the use of ultraclean?
Having scrutinized all the premises, a logical conclusion that can be drawn is that there is some evidence, having been ignored by the author while the answer of which could add to the logic of each premise.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-17 | Technoblade | 60 | view |
| 2023-07-14 | okazaki11 | 83 | view |
| 2023-02-05 | abhikhanna | 58 | view |
| 2023-01-31 | jimHsu | 50 | view |
| 2022-10-09 | Agbaje | 73 | view |
- Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.do you agree or disagree? 73
- What discovery in the past 100 years has been most beneficial for people in your country? 83
- Some people think that children should begin their formal education at a very early age and should spend most of their time on school studies. Other believes that young children should spend most of their time playing. Compare these two views. Which view 76
- Schools should ask students to evaluate their teachers. Do you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons and example to support your answer. 85
- Claim: Researchers should not limit their investigations to only those areas in which they expect to discover something that has an immediate, practical application.Reason: It is impossible to predict the outcome of a line of research with any certainty.W 60
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, still, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.6327345309 117% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.9520958084 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 11.1786427146 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 13.6137724551 125% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 28.8173652695 101% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 55.5748502994 72% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 16.3942115768 98% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1919.0 2260.96107784 85% => OK
No of words: 381.0 441.139720559 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03674540682 5.12650576532 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 4.56307096286 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68365227164 2.78398813304 96% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 204.123752495 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.482939632546 0.468620217663 103% => OK
syllable_count: 599.4 705.55239521 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.96107784431 60% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.471057884232 212% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.76447105788 68% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.22255489022 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 19.7664670659 91% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.8473053892 92% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3555794376 57.8364921388 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.611111111 119.503703932 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1666666667 23.324526521 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 5.70786347227 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.25449101796 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.20758483034 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 6.88822355289 102% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.67664670659 150% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142446732824 0.218282227539 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0540156368103 0.0743258471296 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.083152549194 0.0701772020484 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0742672937504 0.128457276422 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0727895061309 0.0628817314937 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.3799401198 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.3550499002 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.197005988 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.5979740519 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.32208582834 99% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 98.500998004 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 12.3882235529 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.1389221557 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.