“Manned space flight is costly and dangerous. Moreover, the recent success of a series of unmanned space probes and satellites has demonstrated that a great deal of useful information can be gathered without the costs and risks associated with sending men and women into space. Therefore, we should invest our resources in unmanned space flight."
The argument is based on unstated assumptions and conclusion that is not corroborated with facts.
Foremost, there isn't evidence that manned space flights are costly and dangerous. While this 'might' be true considering the examples in the history of manned space flights in the world but there isn't any evidence in the argument which supports this claim. The claim is merely based on an assumption and the assumption fails to be justifiable.
Recent success of a series of unmanned space probes does not account for the all the operations carried henceforth to be unmanned. It highly depends on the nature of the space expedition that is to take place. A few cases of success cannot be accounted for a great number of operations at large when there isn't even a mention of the number of how many space flights were successful and what was the nature of their project.
Moreover, the 'recent success' does not specify success in what field. It could be a success of work which essentially could be done without any human intervention and the unmanned space flight would have been enough for the nature of the task. To extrapolate this piece of information and say that investments should be made in unmanned space flights is taking it too far.
There is not enough evidence which supports how are the unmanned spaceflights are less costly as compared to the manned space flights. There is no comparison given or any numbers that are given which supports this claim. Also, the nature of the useful information being gathered is not specified. There might be information which can only be analysed and understood by a human brain as compared to a machine and it completely depends on the nature of the project for which the space flight has been launched.
Therefore it cannot be concluded that investments should be made in the unmanned space flights because there is not enough evidence which corroborates the same.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-23 | Krisha Lakhani | 58 | view |
| 2023-08-17 | riyarmy | 83 | view |
| 2023-08-11 | Anish Sapkota | 58 | view |
| 2023-08-04 | DCAD123 | 50 | view |
| 2023-07-30 | BusariMoruf | 55 | view |
- Mass media and the internet have caused people’s attention spans to get shorter. However, the overall effect has been positive: while people are less able to focus on one thing, they more than make up for it with an enhanced ability to sort through lar 50
- The first step to self-knowledge is rejection of the familiar. 50
- A pet food company recalled 4 million pounds of pet food in response to complaints that pets that had consumed the food experienced vomiting, lethargy, and other signs of illness. After the recall, the pet food company tested samples from the recalled foo 50
- Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks. 74
- “Manned space flight is costly and dangerous. Moreover, the recent success of a series of unmanned space probes and satellites has demonstrated that a great deal of useful information can be gathered without the costs and risks associated with sending m 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 17, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...oborated with facts. Foremost, there isnt evidence that manned space flights are ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 195, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...ed space flights in the world but there isnt any evidence in the argument which supp...
^^^^
Line 5, column 307, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...umber of operations at large when there isnt even a mention of the number of how man...
^^^^
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ch the space flight has been launched. Therefore it cannot be concluded that in...
^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...the space flight has been launched. Therefore it cannot be concluded that investments...
^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'hence', 'if', 'moreover', 'so', 'therefore', 'while']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.214492753623 0.25644967241 84% => OK
Verbs: 0.197101449275 0.15541462614 127% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0782608695652 0.0836205057962 94% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0608695652174 0.0520304965353 117% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0173913043478 0.0272364105082 64% => OK
Prepositions: 0.113043478261 0.125424944231 90% => OK
Participles: 0.0666666666667 0.0416121511921 160% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.64170287558 2.79052419416 95% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0173913043478 0.026700313972 65% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.001811407834 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.121739130435 0.113004496875 108% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0289855072464 0.0255425247493 113% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0463768115942 0.0127820249294 363% => Maybe 'Which' is overused. If other WH_determiners like 'Who, What, Whom, Whose...' are used too in sentences, then there are no issues.
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1927.0 2731.13054187 71% => OK
No of words: 325.0 446.07635468 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.92923076923 6.12365571057 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.57801047555 93% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.344615384615 0.378187486979 91% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.24 0.287650121315 83% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.172307692308 0.208842608468 83% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.104615384615 0.135150697306 77% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64170287558 2.79052419416 95% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 207.018472906 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.443076923077 0.469332199767 94% => OK
Word variations: 43.9244664398 52.1807786196 84% => OK
How many sentences: 15.0 20.039408867 75% => OK
Sentence length: 21.6666666667 23.2022227129 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3994490327 57.7814097925 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.466666667 141.986410481 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 23.2022227129 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.533333333333 0.724660767414 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 5.14285714286 117% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 3.58251231527 140% => OK
Readability: 45.6666666667 51.9672348444 88% => OK
Elegance: 1.43157894737 1.8405768891 78% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.506350471359 0.441005458295 115% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.137100151197 0.135418324435 101% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0491998362908 0.0829849096947 59% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.645530687399 0.58762219726 110% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.195519124736 0.147661913831 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.221111575514 0.193483328276 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0836877775238 0.0970749176394 86% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.366808212341 0.42659136922 86% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0929988036352 0.0774707102158 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.304204844992 0.312017818177 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102546525333 0.0698173142475 147% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.33743842365 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 6.87684729064 44% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.82512315271 62% => OK
Positive topic words: 7.0 6.46551724138 108% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 5.36822660099 56% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.82389162562 35% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 14.657635468 75% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations to cover all aspects.