Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected. However, since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations, we cannot permit inoculations against cow flu to be routinely administered.
There is no way to evaluate the strength of argument without understanding what the assumptions are, whether they are valid or not and what the impact would be on the argument if they turn out to be unfounded. In the given argument, it is assumed that the disease is cow flu and it is being suggested to give the inoculations against it. The argument is flawed for numerous reasons.
The argument given simply assumes that many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered, but fails to specify the efficiency of the inoculation. To strengthen the argument, it should specify the percentage of the patients completely treated from the disease without showing any side effects with the help of the inoculations.
Despite the lack of evidence, the argument states to administer all the people in the areas where the disease is detected. In the argument further, when it is clearly stated that there might be some possibility of death due to the inoculations then why should we risk the lives of the people who are not diagnosed with the disease. To strengthen the argument, it should clearly state that inoculations shall only be administered to those who are detected with the cow flu.
In the argument finally, it is stated that we can't permit inoculations against cow flu to be routinely administered as there is a small possibility that the person will die as a result of the inoculations. Firstly the argument shall specify the exact percentage of people or the probability of the person dying due to the inoculations. Secondly, if the person is anyways dying due to the disease, it's our prime duty to try and save the patient with the help of the inoculations. To strengthen the argument, it should clearly state the exact probability of death due to inoculations and shall state the exact number of days gap for the routine it's talking about for administering the inoculations.
Ultimately, every step of the argument is based on assumptions that make up for the lack of evidence. If we assume that all the assumptions are there, then it will be safe to draw the conclusion that we can't permit inoculations against cow flu to be routinely administered. However the argument makes several unwarranted assumptions, it fails to make a convincing case that we shall not permit inoculations to be administered in a routinely manner against the cow flu.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-29 | dkim1206 | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | wcfr | 60 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | riyarmy | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-12 | Nowshin Tabassum | 70 | view |
| 2023-07-20 | Mizanur_Rahman | 55 | view |
- All too often companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees such consultants would be unnecessary 58
- Paleo diets in which one eats how early hominids human ancestors did are becoming increasingly popular Proponents claim our bodies evolved to eat these types of food especially bone broth a soup made by cooking animal bones for several hours They believe 57
- Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected However since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations we cannot permit i 50
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 47, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... argument finally, it is stated that we cant permit inoculations against cow flu to ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 398, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...on is anyways dying due to the disease, its our prime duty to try and save the pati...
^^^
Line 7, column 420, Rule ID: TRY_AND[1]
Message: "Try and" is common in colloquial speech, but "'try to'" is recommended for writing.
Suggestion: try to
...e to the disease, its our prime duty to try and save the patient with the help of the i...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 204, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... be safe to draw the conclusion that we cant permit inoculations against cow flu to ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 275, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...t cow flu to be routinely administered. However the argument makes several unwarranted ...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 430, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('routinely') instead an adjective, or a noun ('manner') instead of another adjective.
...rmit inoculations to be administered in a routinely manner against the cow flu.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
anyway, but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, talking about, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.6327345309 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.9520958084 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 11.1786427146 63% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 13.6137724551 103% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 28.8173652695 108% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 55.5748502994 103% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 16.3942115768 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1996.0 2260.96107784 88% => OK
No of words: 405.0 441.139720559 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92839506173 5.12650576532 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48604634366 4.56307096286 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99217085404 2.78398813304 107% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 204.123752495 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.397530864198 0.468620217663 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 647.1 705.55239521 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.96107784431 141% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.76447105788 34% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.22255489022 166% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 19.7664670659 76% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.8473053892 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0404081615 57.8364921388 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.066666667 119.503703932 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 23.324526521 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.70786347227 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.25449101796 114% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.20758483034 37% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 6.88822355289 174% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.67664670659 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.414101763557 0.218282227539 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.161579883554 0.0743258471296 217% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.134501626936 0.0701772020484 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235853754279 0.128457276422 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0653087586293 0.0628817314937 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 14.3799401198 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 48.3550499002 91% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.1628742515 156% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.197005988 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.5979740519 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.32208582834 93% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 98.500998004 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 12.3882235529 93% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.1389221557 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 47, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... argument finally, it is stated that we cant permit inoculations against cow flu to ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 398, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...on is anyways dying due to the disease, its our prime duty to try and save the pati...
^^^
Line 7, column 420, Rule ID: TRY_AND[1]
Message: "Try and" is common in colloquial speech, but "'try to'" is recommended for writing.
Suggestion: try to
...e to the disease, its our prime duty to try and save the patient with the help of the i...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 204, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... be safe to draw the conclusion that we cant permit inoculations against cow flu to ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 275, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...t cow flu to be routinely administered. However the argument makes several unwarranted ...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 430, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('routinely') instead an adjective, or a noun ('manner') instead of another adjective.
...rmit inoculations to be administered in a routinely manner against the cow flu.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
anyway, but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, talking about, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.6327345309 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.9520958084 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 11.1786427146 63% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 13.6137724551 103% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 28.8173652695 108% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 55.5748502994 103% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 16.3942115768 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1996.0 2260.96107784 88% => OK
No of words: 405.0 441.139720559 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92839506173 5.12650576532 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48604634366 4.56307096286 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99217085404 2.78398813304 107% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 204.123752495 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.397530864198 0.468620217663 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 647.1 705.55239521 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.96107784431 141% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.76447105788 34% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.22255489022 166% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 19.7664670659 76% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.8473053892 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0404081615 57.8364921388 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.066666667 119.503703932 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 23.324526521 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.70786347227 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.25449101796 114% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.20758483034 37% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 6.88822355289 174% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.67664670659 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.414101763557 0.218282227539 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.161579883554 0.0743258471296 217% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.134501626936 0.0701772020484 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235853754279 0.128457276422 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0653087586293 0.0628817314937 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 14.3799401198 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 48.3550499002 91% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.1628742515 156% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.197005988 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.5979740519 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.32208582834 93% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 98.500998004 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 12.3882235529 93% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.1389221557 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.