Paleo diets, in which one eats how early hominids (human ancestors) did, are becoming increasingly popular. Proponents claim our bodies evolved to eat these types of food, especially bone broth, a soup made by cooking animal bones for several hours. They believe it has many health-promoting nutrients, such as cartilage, which can heal our joints, and chondroitin, which promotes nerve regeneration. Skeptics point out that ingested cartilage can’t replenish cartilage in your knees or elbows and ingested chondroitin doesn’t make our brains any healthier. Yet, there is strong anecdotal evidence that people who consume bone broth have fewer metabolic and inflammatory diseases than those who don’t. Therefore, ancient humans knew something about our physiology that we don’t, and that by emulating the way they ate, we can cure many chronic illnesses.
The following argument is flawed for numerous reasons. It says that Paleo diets, in which one eats how early hominids (human ancestors) did, are becoming increasingly popular. The argument might not be correct as it is comparing our early ancestors with us in our eating habits. Things have changed particularly from the past as our ancestors didn't have so many options for their food as we have for ourselves today.
The argument makes some unwarranted assumptions, it states that the diets are becoming popular but it doesn't state the exact areas or kind of people who are getting attracted to the Paleo diets. The phase of the argument that bone broth is especially gaining popularity assumes that the people are non vegetarian, while that might not be a specific situation. The argument to strengthen itself must specify the demographic regions and kind of people I. E whether they are non vegetarians or not.
The argument is further flawed as it states that the Proponents claim the bone broth to consist of health nutrients like cartilage and chrotonin, but it's certainly a claim and have no biological backup prevailing their claim. So we can easily refute the proposition made by them, therefore they shall strengthen their argument with the help of experimental conclusions regarding the same.
The argument further says, it was found that people who consumed bone broth had fewer metabolic and inflammatory diseases. This is an another vague statement as it assumes that all the people in this world are alike and would show same response to the bone broth. We can't ignore the fact that what worked for a smaller number of people might not work with most of the humanity. Every living organism in this world has a different kind of digestive system, where the kind of food one can digest can't be surely digested by the other.
Because the argument makes several unwarranted and uncorroborated assumptions and statements, it fails to make a convincing case that Paleo diets, in which one eats how early hominids (human ancestors) did, are becoming increasingly popular.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-23 | Ruhani | 59 | view |
| 2023-08-18 | Mayuresh08 | 70 | view |
| 2023-08-18 | Akash Konar | 55 | view |
| 2023-08-13 | fabjaved | 62 | view |
| 2023-07-16 | hello_kratnesh101 | 47 | view |
- All too often companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees such consultants would be unnecessary 58
- Paleo diets in which one eats how early hominids human ancestors did are becoming increasingly popular Proponents claim our bodies evolved to eat these types of food especially bone broth a soup made by cooking animal bones for several hours They believe 57
- Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected However since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations we cannot permit i 50
Comments
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 14 15
No. of Words: 348 350
No. of Characters: 1706 1500
No. of Different Words: 180 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.319 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.902 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.634 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 113 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 86 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 65 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 43 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 24.857 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.328 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.5 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.357 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.357 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.12 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 1 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 342, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...icularly from the past as our ancestors didnt have so many options for their food as ...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 103, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...t the diets are becoming popular but it doesnt state the exact areas or kind of people...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 360, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...that might not be a specific situation. The argument to strengthen itself must spec...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ether they are non vegetarians or not. The argument is further flawed as it states...
^^^
Line 4, column 131, Rule ID: AN_ANOTHER[1]
Message: One of these determiners is redundant in this context. Choose only one: 'a vague' or 'another vague'.
Suggestion: a vague; another vague
...olic and inflammatory diseases. This is an another vague statement as it assumes that all the pe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 267, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...how same response to the bone broth. We cant ignore the fact that what worked for a ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 494, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
..., where the kind of food one can digest cant be surely digested by the other. Becau...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, regarding, so, then, therefore, while, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.6327345309 81% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.9520958084 62% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 11.1786427146 98% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 13.6137724551 110% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 28.8173652695 132% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 55.5748502994 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 12.0 16.3942115768 73% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1734.0 2260.96107784 77% => OK
No of words: 346.0 441.139720559 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01156069364 5.12650576532 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.56307096286 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67289637302 2.78398813304 96% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 204.123752495 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528901734104 0.468620217663 113% => OK
syllable_count: 545.4 705.55239521 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.96107784431 121% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.76447105788 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 19.7664670659 76% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.8473053892 101% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.7535941951 57.8364921388 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.6 119.503703932 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0666666667 23.324526521 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.70786347227 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.25449101796 133% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.20758483034 85% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 6.88822355289 87% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319146974933 0.218282227539 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10266919678 0.0743258471296 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11092113002 0.0701772020484 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178344198948 0.128457276422 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0981329095301 0.0628817314937 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.3799401198 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.3550499002 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.197005988 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.5979740519 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.32208582834 99% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 98.500998004 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 12.3882235529 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.1389221557 101% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.9071856287 92% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.