A movie producer sent the following memo to the head of the movie studio.
“We need to increase the funding for the movie Working Title by 10% in order to ensure a quality product. As you know, we are working with a first-time director, whose only previous experience has been shooting commercials for a shampoo company. Since the advertising business is notoriously wasteful, it stands to reason that our director will expect to be able to shoot take after take, without concern for how much time is being spent on any one scene. In addition, while we have saved money by hiring relatively inexperienced assistant producers and directors, this savings in salary will undoubtedly translate to greater expenditures in paying the actors and unionized crew overtime for the extra hours they will spend on the set waiting for the assistant directors and producers to arrange things. If we don’t get this extra money, the movie is virtually assured to be a failure"
The argument is flawed for many reason stated in the it. As well as there are unwarranted assumptions stated which led to the rise of fakeness in the argument. Each statement in the paragraph has it's own fault and is explained in the upcoming passages.
Firstly, To talk about the fund, the movie fund must be increased in order to maintain a quality product is not true. Even low budget movies have better quality than higher budget, so quality doesn't depend on the production.
Second fault which I found was about the advertisement, it is said that the advertisement business is notorious which is not true, even they work sincere for the better quality of the advertisement, so one cannot blame another's work by just their profession. It's not that the director wants to pass time by taking a single scene again and again ,it is a flaw in the argument. He may be doing that for the better and perfect quality of the outcome for the audience without any flaw.
Lastly , the argument states the saved amount by hiring relatively inexperienced assistant producers and directors, will be compensated by paying to the cast and crew for their extra hours spent on the set .This is complete flaw, the time spent in the set might vary and it is not because of the director only , although he is one among the reason, the other reasons are not cited here which may be personal reasons too, He also states the if the saved amount is spent then the movie is virtually assured to be a failure , but it is not like that. The double amount of the saved money can be got from the audience response if the script if extremely good.
Thus, the argument is flawed for the above reasons which can be neglected if we consider the cases stated above . These flaws must be recognized and corrected .
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-10 | AAAA2222 | 85 | view |
| 2019-11-04 | Roshan Dhakal | 37 | view |
| 2019-09-25 | TEJAS PATIL | 51 | view |
| 2019-09-18 | himanshupk | 29 | view |
| 2019-07-20 | kaziass | 86 | view |
- A movie producer sent the following memo to the head of the movie studio.“We need to increase the funding for the movie Working Title by 10% in order to ensure a quality product. As you know, we are working with a first-time director, whose only previou 50
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station."Over the past year ,our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news .During this time period,most of the compl 50
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed. 50
- The following argument was made in a newspaper editorial:“The autonomy of any country is based on the strength of its borders; if the number of illegal immigrants entering a country cannot be checked, both its economy and national identity are endangere 50
- A movie producer sent the following memo to the head of the movie studio.“We need to increase the funding for the movie Working Title by 10% in order to ensure a quality product. As you know, we are working with a first-time director, whose only previou 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 50, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'it'?
Suggestion: the; it
...ent is flawed for many reason stated in the it. As well as there are unwarranted assum...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 193, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... quality than higher budget, so quality doesnt depend on the production. Second fau...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 260, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: It's; It is
...anothers work by just their profession. Its not that the director wants to pass tim...
^^^
Line 5, column 345, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...by taking a single scene again and again ,it is a flaw in the argument. He may be ...
^^
Line 5, column 392, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... a flaw in the argument. He may be doing that for the better and perfect quality ...
^^
Line 7, column 7, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...the audience without any flaw. Lastly , the argument states the saved amount by...
^^
Line 7, column 206, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...w for their extra hours spent on the set .This is complete flaw, the time spent in...
^^
Line 7, column 208, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
...for their extra hours spent on the set .This is complete flaw, the time spent in the...
^^^^
Line 7, column 310, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...d it is not because of the director only , although he is one among the reason, th...
^^
Line 7, column 521, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...vie is virtually assured to be a failure , but it is not like that. The double amo...
^^
Line 7, column 638, Rule ID: IF_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
...rom the audience response if the script if extremely good. Thus, the argument ...
^^
Line 9, column 112, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ed if we consider the cases stated above . These flaws must be recognized and corr...
^^
Line 9, column 159, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...e flaws must be recognized and corrected .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, lastly, may, second, so, then, thus, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.6327345309 127% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.9520958084 69% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 11.1786427146 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 13.6137724551 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 28.8173652695 73% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 55.5748502994 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 12.0 16.3942115768 73% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1472.0 2260.96107784 65% => OK
No of words: 318.0 441.139720559 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.62893081761 5.12650576532 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.56307096286 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49255810383 2.78398813304 90% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 204.123752495 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537735849057 0.468620217663 115% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 705.55239521 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59920159681 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.96107784431 141% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.471057884232 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.76447105788 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 19.7664670659 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.8473053892 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 130.33024293 57.8364921388 225% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 122.666666667 119.503703932 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5 23.324526521 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.70786347227 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 13.0 5.25449101796 247% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.20758483034 37% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 6.88822355289 116% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.67664670659 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159024415016 0.218282227539 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0565592004333 0.0743258471296 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0637552459345 0.0701772020484 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0888040143474 0.128457276422 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0738011872656 0.0628817314937 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 14.3799401198 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 48.3550499002 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.197005988 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.87 12.5979740519 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.32208582834 95% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 98.500998004 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 12.3882235529 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.1389221557 111% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.9071856287 67% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.